BobcatFans.com :: View topic - University Star: Suit... -
[Cached Version]
Published on: 9/9/2003
Last Visited: 7/6/2006
Carroll D. Wiley, who filed suit against the university in mid-December of last year, believes that Texas State violated the Whistleblower's Act, which protects a public employee from retaliation by his employer when the employee reports a violation of law in good faith.
Wiley was formerly the executive director of the University Development Foundation.The university terminated his employment on Nov. 16, 2005.Wiley claims that Texas State retaliated against him for reporting an unlawful lack of integrity with Parr's donation by demoting him and eventually terminating his employment.
Texas State employed Wiley for approximately 28 years, according to documents from Gregory D. Jordan, Wiley's attorney.Texas State employed Wiley for approximately 28 years, according to documents from Gregory D. Jordan, Wiley's attorney.
...
The documents report that during these years, Wiley received good evaluations and never received any significant warnings or reprimands until the reputed retaliatory actions.
"Mrs. Parr was a good lady," Wiley said.
...
"Basically, it denies everything that Wiley says," Fly said."It indicates that we had independent reasons for terminating his employment.His reporting a violation of law had nothing to do with his termination."
Fly also said that Wiley had worked in the development office, but was transferred to academic affairs, and then to information technology, positions in which Fly said Wiley showed insubordination and job abandonment. Fly also said that Wiley had worked in the development office, but was transferred to academic affairs, and then to information technology, positions in which Fly said Wiley showed insubordination and job abandonment.
...
Gregory Jordan, Wiley's attorney who was only available for limited comment, echoed Wiley's disappointment with Texas State's alleged mishandling of the Parr donation.
...
"The university, instead of cleaning up the house, ultimately terminated Wiley's employment," Jordan said.
...
Upon discovering that the NEH would not recognize this bequest as part of the match, the documents state that the president and the cabinet decided they would cause the foundation to transfer Parr's funds from the foundation's books to the university's books, call it a gift and then be able to receive the NEH matching funds, a move that Wiley strongly opposed.
...
From what I hear, they had valid reasons for getting rid of Wiley, but it seems, that once again, those brilliant thinkers up on the Hill f'd it all up.
...
From what I hear, they had valid reasons for getting rid of Wiley, but it seems, that once again, those brilliant thinkers up on the Hill f'd it all up.
...
The main point of the article is in fact about this misappropriation of funds, not the dismissal of Mr. Wiley.