www.tsjonline.com/story.php?F=2970557 -
[Cached Version]
Published on: 10/29/2007
Last Visited: 11/21/2007
Barbara Sweet, an aerospace engineer at the NASA Ames Research Center, told attendees at the IMAGE 2007 conference in Scottsdale, Ariz., in July that motion-induced blur "is a highly salient and potentially objectionable issue."And in NASA Ames tests using an LCoS helmet-mounted display, even the lowest levels of perceived blur were above that experienced with CRT and would "likely produce very salient and objectionable differences in perceived resolution as a function of image motion," she said."Other technologies offer advantages beyond CRT projectors that make them attractive," Sweet concluded.
...
With LCoS, the eye moves past the pixel and produces blur on the retina," Sweet said.
...
It appears that shuttering is a worthwhile strategy," Sweet said.Agreeing to a standard for measuring and comparing different technologies and displays is also important, Sweet said."A common measurement standard must be developed to allow side-by-side comparisons of the different models and technologies of today, and to allow more cogent discussions on projector performance," Sweet's paper concludes."For these standards to be usable to inform design decisions, a clear correlation needs to be established between the sensor-based measurement metrics and human perception, across varying levels of contrast, luminance and resolution."FRAME RATE INCREASEMore controversially, Sweet proposed doubling the current typical frame refresh rates from 60 Hertz to 120 Hertz - 120 cycles per second.