www.guardiannewsngr.com/policy_politics/article01//inde -
[Cached Version]
Published on: 1/3/2008
Last Visited: 1/3/2008
Chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), Nuhu Ribadu, mishandled the National Institute of Policy and Strategies Studies (NIPSS) issue and the speculation that the Federal Government is shielding former governors from facing graft charges in court is baseless.
...
COMMENT on reports that the President wants EFCC chairman, Mr. Nuhu Ribadu out and in the process employed the services of the Police Inspector General to send him to NIPSS on study leave ...
...
That is why I would never say anything that would undermine the agency or its Chairman, Nuhu Ribadu, who has always been a brother and a friend.I believe in EFCC and I respect Ribadu a great deal for what he has done at least to stop the culture of impunity.
But what is going on today is not right.I would not want to speculate as to why the Inspector General, Mr. Mike Okiro, would want Ribadu to go on course at this point, especially since he has given his side of the story but from my telephone conversation with him the day the story broke in the media, I think Ribadu mishandled the matter.The lesson here is that even when we hold public offices above our professional ranks, a little bit of humility also pays especially when dealing with constituted authority.As much as I support the work EFCC is doing and the courage of Ribadu, I think the media should discourage anything that tends towards a cult of personality, especially if we want to build institutions.Incidentally, this controversy started at a time the President's attention had been drawn to the fact that Ribadu's name was not sent to the Senate for confirmation as EFCC Chairman in his second term appointment by the former President as required by law.
And efforts were being made to rectify that before it could become an issue.So technically speaking, assuming the President wanted Ribadu out, all he would do was to send the name of somebody else to the Senate.But we are told of how he (President) has been holding meetings just to remove a public official that could be sacked with a mere press statement from this little me.The President feels sad about the blackmail, which has become almost a permanent feature now.The moment EFCC Chairman has issues with any public official, be it the Attorney General or the IGP, the next thing you would hear is that the President wants to remove him to protect some corrupt former governors.If you believe a section of the media, you would think President Yar'Adua's preoccupation since he came to office has been how to remove Ribadu.Please get me right, I believe in Ribadu and the work he is doing and he knows he has friends like us here at the Villa.
...
And besides, I believe Ribadu as a person and EFCC as an institution have done very well in the fight against corruption and would not because of some mistakes being made work against them.Assuming I wanted to do propaganda, I also know what to say to change this one-sided media conversation the way EFCC also mischievously presented the President as shielding some corrupt people.But I would not do or say anything negative against Ribadu or against EFCC notwithstanding the dirty campaign and orchestrated falsehood coming from that end against my boss.
What is painful is that the propaganda is coming at a time the President had decided to forward Ribadu's name to the Senate for confirmation as EFCC Chairman because he has no problem with him.
...
That also presupposes that only the court, and not Ribadu, can pronounce anybody corrupt and that is only upon conviction.That is what the rule of law entails, no matter what we may feel about certain people and the evident ill-gotten wealth in their custody.EFCC also complies fully with that now.
So, to now impute that the President has been holding meetings to get Ribadu out because he wants to protect some people is most unfair and no leader would tolerate such blackmail, which has become an everyday affair now.That is why I say those doing the propaganda are not helping Ribadu or EFCC.Perhaps, if the style had been different, for instance, the President had been alerted of the NIPSS idea in confidence with his intervention sought before going to the media with damaging but false allegations, the story might have been different because there are also people who could have pleaded with the President not to accede to the recommendation.At that point, a decision could still be taken to avert this.But now, the propaganda has changed the whole debate.The recommendation of the IG has been approved, which means Ribadu will attend NIPSS like other officers so recommended.
...
You see, part of the problem is that this matter is being presented as if Ribadu is in competition with the President, that is why you read about how he cannot be removed by anybody, how he has powers to arrest even the Inspector General of Police who nominated him for the NIPSS programme.The misconception is such that you would imagine the war against corruption is now a one-man-show, rather than an institutional process.
But there is also a campaign that I consider unfortunate.It is not true that the President is angry with Ribadu over allegations purportedly leveled by one-convicted 419 individual, which are an unfair charge.Ribadu is an honest and courageous officer doing a difficult job on which he has acquitted himself very well.
...
Speculations are normal with the media but as at today, Ribadu is still EFCC Chairman.And I get amused by what I read because even at this point, the direction of government is not what my friends are speculating in the media.In any case, NIPSS starts in February, so I fail to understand all the brouhaha about replacement and all that at this point.I think ultimately, it is Ribadu and his media friends that would help determine his fate one way or another.If he listens to some of us who are also his friends but on this side of the divide, this matter could still be resolved.But if he relies on media intimidation, it would be most unhelpful.
Haven't you heard the fear being expressed, indeed in many quarters, that the President cannot fight corruption because his former colleagues are involved and that he needs to protect them because of the election?
...
That is another problem with the current debate over the fate of Ribadu who is being equated with EFCC even while we concede the great role he has been playing.
You have not answered the charge that the President may be protecting his former colleagues because of the election issue?