www.vashonbeachcomber.com/portals-code/list.cgi?paper=9 -
[Cached Version]
Published on: 3/16/2005
Last Visited: 3/17/2005
During a three-hour meeting of the committee charged with developing VSD's new Campus Master Plan (CMP), members met with Carter Bagg from the Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction and Mark Prussing from Seattle Northwest Securities Corp.
...
Prussing gave the committee funding options for the CMP."We underwrite a "lot" (italics) of school bonds; it's what we do," said Prussing of his company. He recommended a bond, and Superintendent Mimi Walker said the group has been planning to introduce a bond to voters to pay for the CMP, instead of renewing their Maintenance and Operation Levy for 2006. Prussing's firm is planning to help VSD through the entire process of planning the bond measure, communicating with the public, and filing the motion so it will be put to the voters on the fall ballot.Prussing figures Vashon's current legal debt capacity at about $79 million; he says that some school districts have too little debt capacity for their projects, but noted that clearly is not an issue on Vashon.Repayment of the bond can be managed in several ways, and Prussing showed the committee examples of methods for repaying a $20 million, $40 million and $60 million bond.
...
Prussing provided an impact analysis for a hypothetical voter based on a $20 million bond and a property value of $300,000.He estimated that the gross property tax increase for that person would be $77 per year, and adjusted it to a net increase of about $57 after allowing for income tax deductions.So the person who owns property worth $300,000 currently pays $312 in tax to fund the school's levy.If a $20 million bond passes, that person will pay $389 in tax to fund the school's bond. Prussing estimated that after income tax deductions are calculated, that person will actually see a net increase of about $57, instead of $77.The committee pointed out that the average home on Vashon costs far more than $300,000, and Prussing agreed to provide future impact analyses that used more realistic numbers.Prussing provided a table that showed a $20 million bond would cost voters about $1.40 in taxes per $1,000 in assessed property value; a $40 million bond would up the number to about $1.70 per $1,000; and a $60 million bond would put the number at about $2.10 per $1,000.