ls.fstc.org/archives-ftp/uvx-core/uvx-core.200207 -
[Cached Version]
Published on: 3/25/2003
Last Visited: 3/26/2004
Anne O'Toole, the executive director of New York-based SafeCheck, is a proponent of EFTs.Her company, a part of the SVPCo division of the New York Clearing House, authorizes paper checks and can electronically debit them against actual account balances at the point of sale.
Checks that go through an EFT are settled right away, Ms. O'Toole pointed out; those going through the ACH usually take a day or two, so they are more susceptible to bouncing.
"SafeCheck eliminates the need to have an image, because it's real-time," Ms. O'Toole said."If the transaction is approved, it's done; if the transaction is denied, it's done as well.There's no need for the image."
There is also some wiggle room if the EFT route is taken, Ms. O'Toole said.Even if funds are insufficient, a bank may choose to approve a debit for what it considers a reliable customer, she said.
SafeCheck's board is made up of 11 major banks and the three major EFT networks - Star, NYCE, and Pulse.Transactions under SafeCheck's auspices are routed through those networks rather than the ACH.
"There is a need for an image when it goes down the ACH, because the check could be returned, it could bounce," Ms. O'Toole said.Without an image of the check, which must be returned immediately at the point of sale, the merchant may have neither the person's real name nor address.If a bank is not associated with SafeCheck or the EFT network that covers the merchant, such checks are sent down the ACH, she said.
...
Ms. O'Toole of SafeCheck pointed out that a paper check is regulated by the Uniform Commercial Code unless converted to an electronic debit at the point of sale.
...
Ms. O'Toole said there will be four more by yearend.