www.straight.com/article-240588/emwaterlifeem-flows-tea -
[Cached Version]
Published on: 7/10/2009
Last Visited: 7/16/2009
Toronto-based director Kevin McMahon told the Straight by phone from that city that people getting teary as a result of watching his meticulously shot film is "not an uncommon reaction".
McMahon's seen the same result in audiences in T.O. On July 17, Vancouverites will get the chance to see the 109-minute movie when it opens in theatres here.
...
"Most places in the world get their drinking water from ground water, but the Great Lakes in a way is unique, in that almost everybody that lives on them gets their water directly from the lakes," McMahon said.
"So, yeah, it hits home in that sense.
The child[bearing]-age women are the ones that really come out of it with tears in their eyes because they realize that this is fucking up their bodies and therefore it's fucking up the genetics of their kids."
McMahon does maintain clear focus on the artistic, never venturing too far into the more polemic territory of, say, Michael Moore-who also grew up near the Great Lakes.
"Part of the brilliance of the filmmaking," Achbar said, "is that he [McMahon] manages to celebrate the beauty and the excitement and the human love of water at the same time as he delivers a lot of very important information about the damage that we are doing to it and that it in turn is doing right back to us."
...
McMahon said he used about six different types of cameras to get what he needed.
"We really worked hard to try and bring the water to life and use every strategy we could think to use," he said.
"It's beautiful.
That's what we wanted it to be.
People have to appreciate the beauty of it to appreciate the threats."
But the approach is not without its detractors.
Both Achbar and McMahon readily concede there are risks associated with, say, keeping scientists anonymous and off-camera, as it invariably irks journalistic purists demanding attribution.
"The lack of attribution of scientists annoys some of them," McMahon said.
"I would say [of] the mainstream critics in Toronto, two-thirds of them loved it and a third of them kicked it about.
That was their criticism: that it wasn't straightforward-enough journalism."
Another criticism was the presence of First Nations voices, McMahon added.
However, that particular risk may have paid dividends overall.