Joe H. Mattingly III

• 
  wordpress.com/tag/news-media/feed/ - [Cached Version]
  Published on: 5/12/2008    Last Visited: 5/18/2008  

  Larry Belcher, Warren County Sheriff Jerry "Peanut" Gaines, Nelson County Judge Executive Dean Watts, Bullitt County Sheriff Donnie Tinnell, Hancock County Judge Executive Jack B. McCaslin, Community Leader Becky Reska, Community Leader Gary Bagby, Marion County Attorney Joe Mattingly, Marion County Jailer Barry Brady, Ohio County Judge Executive David Jones, Meade County Judge Executive Harry Craycroft, Meade County PVA Mark Straney, Spencer County Commissioner Bill Drury & Community Leader Sandy Drury, Taylor County Judge Executive Eddie Rogers, Washington County Judge Executive John Settles

• 
  www.lebanonenterprise.com/cgi-bin/storyviewnew.cgi?015+ - [Cached Version]
  Published on: 12/19/2007    Last Visited: 12/19/2007  

  Officially, the agreement will be between the city and the Marion County Public Properties Corporation, according to Marion County Attorney Joe Mattingly.He added that the public properties corporation may have a special meeting Thursday when the fiscal court is scheduled to hold a regular meeting.
  
  The magistrates and the county judge are the board members for the public properties corporation, Mattingly said.
  
  The judicial board voted 6-1 in favor of the proposed sale price.

• 
  www.lebanonenterprise.com/cgi-bin/storyviewnew.cgi?015+ - [Cached Version]
  Published on: 11/11/2007    Last Visited: 11/11/2007  

  Nevertheless, the fiscal court asked Marion County Attorney Joe Mattingly to draft a social host ordinance and present it at the Nov. 15 meeting.

• 
  www.lebanonky.org/charts/countyphonenumbers.html - [Cached Version]
  Published on: 10/13/2008    Last Visited: 6/28/2008  

  County Attorney - Joe H. Mattingly, III 692-1260

• 
  AnyTown News - [Cached Version]
  Published on: 11/11/2002    Last Visited: 11/11/2002  

  In a motion for a summary judgement filed in September, Marion County Attorney Joe Mattingly said Marion County Rescue Squad, Inc. was the "bailee" of funds appropriated to it to perform rescue services and fiscal court was "the rightful owner of such funds."
  ...
  According to Mattingly, on Aug. 5, 2001, when the order of affiliation between the county and the rescue squad was terminated, the rescue squad had a "duty" to return "bailed" property to the county.They have refused to do so and have "undertook all responsibility for all funds," Mattingly said. "To reach a decision other than one requiring accountability in return of taxpayers' dollars by the defendants to the county would fly in the face of fiscal responsibility..." Mattingly said."To adopt the apparent reasoning of the defendants', that once received by them, tax payer dollars are under their exclusive control with no obligation of accountability would create a mockery of the governmental budgetary process."
  ...
  In a written response to George's response, Mattingly said Marion County Rescue Squad, Inc.'s contention that fiscal court wrongfully terminated an order of affiliation with it "has nothing to do with" the county's complaint.Furthermore, Mattingly said, the order of affiliation never named a "corporate entity" as the recipient of funds.Mattingly entered into evidence in response to Marion Count Rescue Squad, Inc.'s argument that some funds, including a $1,600 contribution, came from "other sources."A cancelled check for $1,600 signed by Marion County Treasurer Sam Fogle and Marion County Judge-Executive Dave Hourigan shows that those funds allegedly coming from "other sources" actually came from fiscal court as an "additional appropriation," Mattingly said.
  ...
  Furthermore, Mattingly said, the rescue squad acts "under the umbrella" of fiscal court and its "sole existence as an entity" is due to its affiliation with fiscal court.

• 
  Attorney News Aug 2005: News about attorney, lawyer... - [Cached Version]
  Published on: 8/1/2005    Last Visited: 4/14/2006  

  An incident early this year surrounding the death of at least eight cattle has ended with an agreement between Marion County Attorney Joe Mattingly and the cattle owner. (Wed, 17 Aug 2005 12:38:11 GMT)
  
  Attorney: School killing may have been part of suicide pact

• 
  Lebanon Enterprise - [Cached Version]
  Published on: 3/10/2004    Last Visited: 3/11/2004  

  Joe Mattingly, owner of All Season's Minit Mart in St. Mary, expressed concern about his business' outstanding garbage bill.
  ...
  Mattingly told magistrates that he and former Marion County Judge-Executive Merriell Mattingly made a deal years ago that he, his five rental homes and his business could dispose of their trash in a Dumpster at All Seasons Minit Mart for $65 a month.
  
  Since then, garbage rates have increased.Mattingly is being charged $150 a month for Dumpster pick-up and his tenants are also paying a garbage bill.But they are still putting their trash in his Dumpster, Mattingly said.
  
  "The problem is that they have been getting a bill and I've been getting a bill," he said."It looks like to me that the same amount of garbage has been billed twice."
  
  Mattingly asked the court for a "concession" on his current bill.
  
  According to Marion County Judge-Executive Dave Hourigan, there should have never been a deal made between Mattingly and the former judge-executive.
  ...
  €Approved a list of garbage accounts that will be taken to small claim's court by Marion County Attorney Joe Mattingly for not paying their delinquent account.
  
  Print this story
  
  Email this story

• 
  Lebanon Enterprise - [Cached Version]
  Published on: 3/3/2004    Last Visited: 3/4/2004  

  Mattingly's practices law to help people
  ...
  In the case of Marion County Attorney Joe Mattingly, that sentiment rings true.
  
  Marion County Attorney Joe Mattingly was chosen as the Lebanon-Marion County Chamber of Commerce's Outstanding Businessperson for 2003.
  
  Mattingly, the Lebanon-Marion County Chamber of Commerce's Outstanding Businessperson of the Year for 2003, has never regarded himself as a businessman.He's a lawyer.
  
  Years ago, he convinced his wife, Carol, to run the business component of his law practice.He didn't enjoy the business aspect.He just wanted to practice law.
  
  So, it's really his wife that deserves the award, he admits.
  
  But making the transformation from a Loretto boy to an attorney who has stood face to face with the United States Supreme Court hasn't been easy.
  
  Growing up in Loretto with four sisters and one brother, Mattingly was heavily influenced by the Sisters of Loretto at the Loretto Motherhouse, which is where he spent many of his summers as a young boy.
  
  It's there where his interest in social justice was sparked.
  
  "They tried to make you understand what social issues were and social justice was," Mattingly said."I think back now at how amazing an opportunity that was.The ladies there had amazing experiences.They did a very good job of opening a little kid's eyes."
  
  During his grade school and high school years, Mattingly always said that he would never move out of Loretto.At the time, he couldn't imagine a place where he would rather live.He even considered following in his father's footsteps and running the Mattingly Funeral Home in Loretto.But, because of the encouragement from John Smith, a local attorney, and Smith's wife, Suzie Smith, Mattingly's "all-time favorite teacher," he decided to go to college and study law.
  
  "I had a lot of interest in being active and involved and had a lot of questions about why people did the things they did and how the system worked," Mattingly said."Their encouragement probably, more than anything else, was the reason why I decided to go that route."
  
  He graduated from Marion County High School in 1979 and attended the University of Kentucky where he received his Bachelor of Science degree in accounting in 1983 and his Juris Doctor Degree in 1986.
  
  He and his wife planned to live in Louisville.But a conversation with John Smith changed those plans and Mattingly and his wife moved back to Marion County in 1986 so he could join Spragens, Smith & Higdon, P.S.C.
  
  He stayed there for 10 years then opened his own practice.
  
  At age 29, Mattingly became Marion County Attorney and he's one of three Kentucky lawyers in this decade who has argued and won civil cases before the United States Supreme Court.
  
  He vividly remembers sitting directly in front of Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor and just hoping that one word would come out of his mouth.
  
  Very few lawyers ever get a chance to argue a case in front of the Supreme Court so Mattingly's experience was a huge success.But it's the small successes that make him feel good when he goes home at night to his wife and three children - Christine, 11, Nicole, 8, and Kelly, 3.
  
  "It seems that most days are like a streak of lightning," Mattingly said.

• 
  Lebanon Enterprise - [Cached Version]
  Published on: 9/11/2003    Last Visited: 9/12/2003  

  The lawsuit, filed by Marion County Attorney Joe Mattingly on behalf of the county and Whitlock in October 2001, alleged that members of Marion County Rescue Squad, Inc. had retained control of $9,000 consisting of taxpayer revenues for the purpose of rescue squad activities.
  ...
  Marion County Attorney Joe Mattingly filed a lawsuit in October 2001 on behalf of Marion County Fiscal Court and former Marion County Emergency Management Director J.T. Whitlock against Marion Count Rescue Squad, Inc. and some former rescue squad members.

• 
  Lebanon Enterprise - [Cached Version]
  Published on: 11/20/2003    Last Visited: 11/22/2003  

  According to Marion County Attorney Joe Mattingly, if there were things discussed related to Luce's vehicle, that type of discussion is not included within the exceptions of the open meetings law.
  ...
  Mattingly said he wasn't present when magistrates discussed the list of delinquent garbage accounts.According to Mattingly, fiscal court can't make a decision to sue or not to sue during closed session.
  
  He said in the past he has had to make cautionary statements to fiscal court as to what it could and could not talk about.
  
  "If they had gotten clearly away of what I believed was appropriate in executive session, I would caution them that they were not permitted to discuss those items in executive session," Mattingly said.

Page:  1 2