www.construction-today.com/content/view/714/31/ -
[Cached Version]
Published on: 2/11/2008
Last Visited: 3/3/2008
In part, the lag in adopting technology has to do with the perception by middle and field management that every project is so unique, that they are unable "to see the bigger picture and the efficiencies [of technology]," says Glenn Matteson, a senior consultant with FMI Corp."[Contractors] get into a rut and focus on the details and how to solve problems rather than to avoid problems," he says."I think that can get into the way of the process of how we procure, estimate and bid work."
Moving into the technological age is more than just building up your business, and it occurs in a much more complicated way since the results and benefits of doing such are not always clear, Matteson says.
The ideal way to integrate technology into the workplace "is to start small," Matteson says."Find an internal champion and go from there.If it starts at the top, you can coach and guide and take small measures , find the baseline and figure out if production was better, for example."
Several applications used in construction can be enhanced or reinvented using technology, Matteson says.
...
In fact, Matteson and Mathews both say the cost of technology isn't really a barrier at all.
...
Matteson suggests improving on a company's existing resources.Contractors, for example, can start by applying the equipment they have in a smarter way.Put simply, companies should do more using less.Matteson uses the example of the heavy-highway and civil contractor who knows little about how its fleet performs in terms of lost fuel costs due to idling time, or the effects of a poor maintenance program.So by outfitting an already top-performing piece of heavy equipment with a telematic device, field productivity is positively impacted.
...
"I think it comes down to trying something and see if it improves productivity," Matteson says.