Community Building Initiative - Metropolitan Planning... -
[Cached Version]
Published on: 2/8/2007
Last Visited: 5/15/2009
Peter Levavi, vice president of Brinshore Development,and MPC Housing Committee member; and
...
Carl Byrd, Joseph Williams, Don Carter, Peter Levavi and Shirley Newsome
...
Brinshore Development's Peter Levavi summarized three components of architecture and design of mixed-income communities based on lessons the company has learned: the decision-making process, macro-planning, and micro-planning.
He reiterated the importance of community participation for legitimacy and support, but stated it is difficult to get "real, important and meaningful input" for a couple of reasons.
Many people have pressing concerns or grievances that need to be addressed before they can focus on community planning.
In addition, most are ill-equipped to have a technical discussion about architecture.
To remedy this reality, Brinshore uses Image Preference Surveys to solicit public input through a series of slides that are ranked by participants on a scale of 1 to 5 according to their desirability.
After the initial survey, a new slide show is created and the images are ranked again.
Levavi commented that these surveys show "how much shared vision there really is between income groups."
For site planning and building design, Levavi recommended a few best practices, including: creating solid streetwalls, i.e., avoiding gaps between buildings that become no man's territory; designing buildings that face the street so people can see what's going on from their homes; rearranging Chicago's typically narrow residential lots in a creative manner to provide private outdoor space; and including diverse residential designs by using a team of architects instead of just one firm.
In his experience, Levavi said backyards attached to individual units work better than large, communal areas of open space because they promote each resident's sense of ownership.
A variety of building designs help create a sense of uniqueness and attachment to units and buildings.
Levavi also stressed the concepts of universal design to accommodate the needs of diverse households and green initiatives for energy-efficient plans that contribute to sustainability while reducing utility bills - a significant expense, especially for low-income residents.
He acknowledged that public housing redevelopment can be "fantastically expensive," but explained the task of building mixed-income communities is an "iterative process in which we learn more from each development."
...
Levavi said he does not consider making market-rate and subsidized homes indistinguishable a challenge, but acknowledged that "the bar has been raised for rental units in mixed-income communities.
Amenities such as dishwashers and washer/dryer hookups are expected.
He also said market-rate and affordable housing renters often have lower expectations than public housing residents in terms of room size, and it has been more of a challenge to attract public housing renters to the new homes than market-rate or affordable renters.