www.lobbywatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=2785 -
[Cached Version]
Published on: 4/3/2004
Last Visited: 3/5/2009
GIG director Alistair Kent had rallied protestors suffering hereditary diseases by claiming that they were about to be denied the change of a cure if MEPs did not vote for the Life Patent Directive.
This time, the law passed.
GlG's lobbying is widely credited as having been decisive in its approval.
GlG's action attracted complaints from the very patient interest groups it was supposed to represent.
The groups pointed out that GlG's policy had always been against gene patenting.
Alistair Kent issued a letter restating the anti-patents-on-life views of the group, which were officially unchanged.
So how did he come to behave in such a contrary fashion?