www.law.com/jsp/ihc/PubArticleIHC.jsp?id=1207305784469 -
[Cached Version]
Published on: 4/6/2008
Last Visited: 4/6/2008
Jones Day partner R. Todd Johnson thinks it's reasonable, too.Current law in California has caused him to advise at least one client to incorporate in another state.
Johnson is the partner-in-charge of Jones Day's Silicon Valley office, and focuses his practice on renewable energy companies as well as companies seeking to have an impact on sustainable growth and energy efficiency.
One such client, a founder of a small San Francisco Bay Area startup, who asked to remain anonymous because the company is still in research and development mode, said it took him by surprise that he could not set up an organization in California that states in its mission its intent to consider interests of stakeholders other than its shareholders."Everyone in Silicon Valley goes straight to Delaware, the most shareholder-friendly state in the country, but the most hostile to stakeholders," he said.
He said that he wanted to create a corporation with a "very clear double bottom line," one that included both a social and a financial mission.
He said that many lawyers representing venture capitalists have balked at the idea that a for-profit corporation add the interests of other stakeholders."The first rule of investment is that you have got to focus on the investor returns, and that's fine -- venture investors are putting a lot of money on very high-risk investments," the founder said.But, he added, "We don't want to be this big faceless Delaware company that only responds to shareholders."
Johnson, who recommended that the client incorporate in New York, has reviewed which states' corporate laws have adopted particularly inclusive constituency provisions.
Many states enacted constituency statutes in the 1980s, Johnson said, at the height of the hostile takeover fever, which saw companies shutting down lower-profit branches and factories and moving labor abroad.Legislatures reacted to the loss of jobs and a tax base by giving directors the explicit right to consider interests other than shareholders.
For companies "not satisfied just doing it part way," Johnson said, he now recommends states like New York, Ohio or Pennsylvania, where there are well-developed corporate laws and sophisticated courts."They're not scary jurisdictions."
Green matters are of concern to big corporations, too, Johnson noted.
Target Corp., for example, publicizes that it gives 5 percent of its income to community programs.Wal-Mart Stores Inc. is pushing its broad "Sustainability 360" initiative, through which it has pledged to reduce packaging throughout its supply chain, and meet other goals.
Johnson said he's cautiously optimistic that AB 2944 will pass.