Global Custodian Summer 1994: International package... -
[Cached Version]
Published on: 3/10/2001
Last Visited: 3/10/2001
If a dealer can take positions down and make money trading them on a risk basis , then the trade is too expensive , believes Sheldon Johnson , a managing director at Morgan Stanley responsible for global portfolio trading , futures , and options.If the dealer had done an agency trade instead , the client would have made that money.So , in a risk trade , it's the dealer's money instead of the client's money.Or the trade might be too cheap.In this case , the dealer loses money.But I would argue that in the majority of cases it is the customer that pays too much.That's why our business is growing most rapidly on the agency side..
...
We , however , think that such trades are very high risk and we don't believe that we can facilitate them in the long term , says Johnson.
Both quants and active managers tend to be more time sensitive than indexers because their asset allocation is based on research or models that place a premium on opportunity costs relative to market impact.PanAgora uses futures extensively to minimize the market impact of its tactical asset allocation , and swaps these into physicals if they opt for a longer , strategic exposure.But this time-sensitivity cannot be generalized to a preference for a certain style of trading.GMO's Chu , for example , prefers plain vanilla agency trades.In the US , we use futures to equitize cash and unwind them as we acquire stock.But in international , there is no EAFE future and many other futures are not CFTC approved , so US funds cannot legally hold them.