The River Cities' Reader Online -
[Cached Version]
Published on: 3/1/2006
Last Visited: 3/29/2006
"Without the Freight House transaction, we probably weren't going to do [the] Builders [building]," said Darryl High High, president of the Regency Companies of Eastern Iowa.High's company has options on both the Freight House and the Builders site directly north.Control of the Freight House is essential because of the residential components High wants to develop at Builders, he said.
...
The Freight House project appeared dead last month, after the Davenport City Council voted down the $15,000 payment to High for a 120-day option to take over the Freight House property.
High is now paying Larry Whitty $7,000 a month for a purchase option, and Regency could pull the trigger on its option - or simply continue to pay $7,000 each month to Whitty - without city involvement.
...
But at this point, the city is working with High, because he has the purchase option on the building.
The proposal would have given the City of Davenport 120 days to study the public-market issue with the option of entering into a 20-year Freight House lease with High.Under the lease terms, High would pay the city's Levee Improvement Commission between $22,000 and $45,000 a year to lease the land the Freight House is on, while the city would lease back an as-yet-undisclosed amount of space for the public market at a rate of $70,000 a year.The lease-option document the council turned down also included three 10-year renewal options.
An effort to reconsider the city-council vote was thwarted when five alderman walked out of a meeting.
But High is still interested in pursuing the project, he told the River Cities' Reader earlier this month.
"We could have been building this thing in June or July," High said.Now, that's unlikely, and he's targeting opening for the 2007 festival season.
High said that his company is not interested in developing the public-market concept without some sort of assistance from the city."We need to know if they're going to participate in the public market," he said.If not, he said, his company will need to decide if it wants to try to develop a different project on the Freight House property.
...
High said he'd like the issue of city involvement resolved by mid-May."I don't think we have a drop-dead date," he said.
...
The basic business model is that High will hold a new lease for the Freight House property with the city and will lease a portion of that - the one-story part of the complex and a covered outdoor area - to the city for the public market.The remainder of the property - the two-story portion - would remain under High's control and might be used for something such as a restaurant.
The city plans to have a private entity operate the public market, and the costs of the project would be covered by the market's income along with increased property values in the market district stemming from new growth.According to Malin, the goal would be that those operational and increased-property-tax revenues would even cover the cost of leasing the public-market space back from High.
...
High said that considering the property is in a flood plain, the lease between Whitty and the Levee Improvement Commission is "laughable."
...
A developer who assumes the lease at this point doesn't get the benefit Whitty had for a decade, and therefore would actually be overpaying for the property, High said.
...
Neither Whitty nor High returned messages left for them on Tuesday.
The city would not just lose money in terms of less lease revenue.The city would pay $70,015 annually for the public-market portion of the lease, bringing the total cost to more than $2.16 million over 20 years.
The combination of Regency's and the city's lease payments mean that High will actually end up making between $25,000 and $48,000 a year on the Freight House in its transactions with the city.