Photo of: A.F. Haney

Prof. A.F. Haney

View Title...

University of Chicago School of Medicine
A.F.'s profile was created using:
Sort By:

1-4 of 4 online sources for A.F. Haney

  • View Online Source
    www.parenting.com/article/Fertility/Infertility/Why-Can - [Cached Version]
    Published on: 10/7/2009    Last Visited: 10/7/2009  

    "If a couple was able to get pregnant before, in most cases something specific must have changed," says A.F. Haney, M.D., professor of obstetrics and gynecology at the University of Chicago School of Medicine.

  • View Online Source
    www.weblogmaniacs.com/travels - [Cached Version]
    Published on: 1/18/2006    Last Visited: 3/2/2008  

    Professor A.F. Haney, Obstetrics/gynecology, and chairman of obstetrics/gynecology, at the University of Chicago, Illinois, invented a watch, has a sodium monitor on the back.

  • View Online Source
    www.parenting.com/article/Fertility/Infertility/Why-Can - [Cached Version]
    Published on: 2/11/2009    Last Visited: 2/11/2009  

    "If a couple was able to get pregnant before, in most cases something specific must have changed," says A.F. Haney, M.D., professor of obstetrics and gynecology at the University of Chicago School of Medicine.

  • View Online Source
    Canesi v. Wilson - [Cached Version]
    Published on: 1/4/2001    Last Visited: 2/21/2006  

    ,Consistent with the elimination of the warning, defendants' expert, Dr. A.F. Haney, Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Duke University Medical Center, found "no scientific basis for limb reduction with exposure to progestins," such as Provera.Dr. Haney explained that early reports of an "association" between Provera and limb reduction defects were based on "very bad epidemiology."He concluded:

    ,,When careful analysis was performed, it became very obvious there was no scientific information whatsoever to support any association of limb reduction with progestins of any kind. . . . As a consequence, this patient and her family have been [misled] into thinking there is some potential association.It's certainly understandable for them [to] try and find a cause for their child's anomaly.The one thing that can clearly be said is that this is not related to the 10 days of Provera she took during [the] luteal phase of her conceptive cycle.

Wrong Person?

Related searches
More...

Copyright © 2009 Zoom Information Inc. All rights reserved.

BBeachHead-2009-09-28_RC001.1 OM11