SGVTribune.com - What's in a name? -
[Cached Version]
Published on: 1/4/2007
Last Visited: 1/4/2007
Naming patterns also follow long-term trends, according to J. David Hacker, a history professor at New York's Binghamton University, who has studied U.S. first names from the Colonial era through 1920.
"There was a revolution in naming patterns in the Colonial period, especially in Puritan New England, which very consciously turned to the Bible as a source of forenames," he said.
In 17th- and early 18th-century America, 90 percent of first names were biblical, versus 50 percent in England during the same period, where names linked to royalty were more popular.
After the Revolutionary War, though, the U.S. naming pool was largely secularized.Working from census records, which use the names people are known by, not their formal names, Hacker found that in 1780, two-thirds of U.S. male names came from the Bible, while that number dropped to under 20 percent in 1920.
Girls' names vary more widely across generations, though Mary had a lock on the top spot in the early years the way Michael did more recently.
Hacker thinks "that in the 18th and 19th centuries, male names were taken more seriously, while girls names were driven more by fashion."
Among immigrants in the early 20th century, some purposely looked for classic American names for their children, while others who tried to hold on to their heritage, Hacker said.