opinion.inquirer.net/inquireropinion/columns/view/20080 -
[Cached Version]
Published on: 6/7/2008
Last Visited: 6/20/2008
According to the renowned psychologist Bob Cummins, what subjective indicators measure is happiness as a mood, rather than happiness as an emotion.A mood is something stable, whereas an emotion tends to be fleeting.Cummins explains the narrow variation of happiness in surveys, all over the world, by theorizing that happiness, as a mood, is controlled by a management system that he calls subjective well-being homeostasis.
Just as their physiological systems normally keep body temperature within a narrow range, people's psychological systems normally work to keep happiness from extreme change.A homeostatic system is resilient, working to help people bounce back from unusually bad (or even unusually good) experiences.
Unhappy people seek help from external resources, the major ones being money and relationships.Cummins says that emotionally intimate relationships are the most powerful defense.Unhappy people also use internal resources such as the ability to rationalize or "explain away" a bad situation, to their advantage. (Would feeling a close relationship to God be an internal or an external resource?Either way, this homeostatic element would be very Filipino.)
Bob Cummins, professor of psychology at Deakin University and developer of the Australian Unity Wellbeing Index, is the incoming president of the International Society for Quality of Life Studies and editor-in-chief of the Journal of Happiness Studies.