The Gisborne Herald Online -
[Cached Version]
Published on: 7/28/2006
Last Visited: 7/28/2006
Counsel for the applicants, Gordon Webb, called viticulture consultant Allan Clarke to give expert evidence on concerns associated with viticulture and horticulture production, as raised by the objectors.
...
Mr Clarke said the loss of a small area of existing vineyards would have a minor effect on the continued viability and production of wines, as long as any proposed accessway to the landlocked site was correctly engineered to complement existing drainage systems and configuration of the vines.
Estimating the economic loss of grape income for both vineyards, Mr Clarke said potential losses would not affect what had already been viable vineyard operations.
Flexibility in fruit supply agreements ensured it would not be jeopardised by factors beyond the control of the grower, including loss of land.
However, under cross- examination Mr Clarke agreed this statement did not reflect on the fruit supply agreements of the appellants, who did not do business based on estimated crops but rather land areas.
Mr Upton said the appellants would give evidence that the figures Mr Clarke provided about estimated yield and economic losses were severely underestimated.