OA Online News -
[Cached Version]
Published on: 9/22/2002
Last Visited: 9/22/2002
In-fill development, though, may not be the only way to go, and it's certainly not the most cost-effective method, according to Jim Butler, the executive director of the Odessa Housing Finance Corp.
When working with in-fill, developers need to build one project at a time, deal with old, perhaps inoperable infrastructure and perhaps demolish vacant structures, he said.
And although Butler says that, with limited resources and the needs of the community he would pursue multihome developments first, he does not deny the importance of in-fill projects.
"The multihome developments are the most economical, and they're easier to market," Butler said."That's not to say we don't need to pursue in-fill projects, even though we might not be able to do that."
Home buyers may not be keen on purchasing a house in an older neighborhood that may not be as safe and may even be more expensive, Butler says, not to mention that developers can produce multihome subdivisions very quickly and by purchasing materials in bulk - which drives down the price.
Butler poses this hypothetical to clarify:
"Are you going to feel more comfortable buying a new home in a new neighborhood or are you going to feel more comfortable buying a new home around others that were built in the 1950s?"he asks."The older homes are going to diminish the value of your house."
Butler, though, is quick to say that Odessa would do well to embark on both types of development because both will satisfy important housing needs.
...
Ultimately, the question of what kind of housing development to pursue is a matter of finances, Butler says.
The community ought to pursue what it can afford, and provide the most product to the most people, he says.So despite the benefits of in-fill projects, conventional development initially should be the way to go.
"We just don't have enough money to take care of that, quite frankly," he said.
Dispelling the Myths
Other research has been done on the effects of in-fill development instead of traditional home subdivisions.American Farmland Trust, a nonprofit organization dedicated to preserving U.S. farmland and wildlife, did a study in Hays County just south of Austin.