Please Note:
This profile was automatically generated using 8 references found on the Internet. This information has not been verified. Learn more...
This profile was automatically generated using 8 references found on the Internet. This information has not been verified. Learn more...
View all 8 references Web References
-
1. AGR Online/ National News
www.nativemetiswomenscouncil.c - [Cached]Published on: 7/2/2005 Last Visited: 2/1/2007
"As with all weapons, there is potential for inflicting collateral damage," says Tom Burris, a Lockheed scientist. -
2. New Scientist
www.newscientist.com/news/news - [Cached]Last Visited: 7/25/2002
"As with all weapons, there is potential for inflicting collateral damage," says Tom Burris, a scientist in the Lockheed Laser Program. But he says eye damage is about the only side effect of laser use; conventional weapons are more likely to miss their targets, and their blast effects cover larger areas.
Laser-armed planes could pick their targets. "For example, instead of attacking the hood of the car, you might go after the tyres because the chances of a reflection hitting the driver are less," Burris told New Scientist.
Protective goggles
The US is working on special protective goggles for its soldiers, and other countries will do likewise if the US deploys laser weapons - although they will need to know the laser's wavelength.
But that will not protect civilians from stray reflections if a beam misses its target and hits a town, say. And scattered beams could be powerful enough to damage sight many kilometres away. -
3. www.deps.org
www.deps.org/DEPSpages/SSDLTR0 - [Cached]Published on: 5/5/2003 Last Visited: 12/25/2007
Mr. Tom Burris (Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Co.): Military Utility of HEL Fighter

