State expert uncertain in dispute over initials -
[Cached Version]
Published on: 1/14/2004
Last Visited: 7/5/2007
John F. Breslin, the handwriting expert who testified for the state, said he could draw "no definite conclusion" from his study of the rights-waiver form and handwriting samples Picerno provided.
Breslin said he uses a nine-point scale ranging from definitively identifying a given writing sample as belonging to a person, to definitively ruling out that person as the author of the sample.
Breslin said Picerno's case fell in the middle of the scale, but that he was "leaning toward" identifying Picerno as the author of sets number seven and eight.
He said there was "gross variation" even among the sets of initials Picerno acknowledged as his own.For instance, the sample sets of initials Picerno gave last month were much larger than the initials on the form, and each R in the sample initials had a flourish at its front, absent from the initials on the form.
"I have unexplainable inconsistencies that I really couldn't arrive at any conclusion with," Breslin said."There's no solid basis for a true, complete opinion."
But he said there were similarities between the two questioned sets of initials and the samples Picerno gave.Specifically, he said the questioned sets had a "very rigid" quality that he also pointed out in some of the sample initials.
Breslin works as a forensic document examiner for the U.S. Postal Service in New York, and previously spent more than 20 years as a New York City police officer, most of those years as a document examiner for the Police Department.