Please Note:
This profile was automatically generated using 4 references found on the Internet. This information has not been verified. Learn more...
This profile was automatically generated using 4 references found on the Internet. This information has not been verified. Learn more...
Web References
-
1. www.thefirstwhistleblower.net
www.thefirstwhistleblower.net/ - [Cached]Published on: 3/8/2007 Last Visited: 3/8/2007
Allowing Daniel Brenden (Maricopa County Attorney's Office) to act as counsel for the Defendants even though he is a WITNESS in this case (A violation of Az. Bar Ethics Rule 1.7), Routinely failing to sign orders (Required in order to appeal his decisions), Continually verbally berating the Plaintiff for attempting to exercise his right to "Due Process"
...
Daniel Brenden, Maricopa County Attorney's Office
...
Daniel Brenden, Maricopa County Attorney's Office
...
Daniel Brenden, Maricopa County Attorney's Office RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR DEFAULT
...
Maricopa County Attorney's Office, Daniel Brenden SEPARATE MOTION AND ORDER TO DIRECT PLAINTIFF'S COMMUNICATION TO DEFENDANT'S COUNSEL
Though the County Attorney's office has NEVER filed a "Notice of Appearance" on behalf of Defendants [Kenneth] Medlin, [Terry] Peterson, & [Jennipher] Ramsey, and since the Plaintiff has sent copies of his pleadings to those Defendants (as required by law), the County now asserts that it represents such, and requests the Court to order the Plaintiff to cease ALL contact with them.
08/05/2003 View .PDF File MCLC03080502 Maricopa County Attorney's Office, Daniel Brenden
...
Since Daniel Brenden was listed as a witness in this case, he was barred from representing ANYONE, and therefore the Court could not accept his notice of appearance, nor any pleadings (answer/response) on behalf the Defendants. Therefore, his answer was invalid and no answer had been lawfully filed.
...
Since Daniel Brenden (and the Court) had been notified that he was a crucial witness in this case, he was therefore barred by Arizona State Bar Ethics Rule 1.7 from representing ANYONE!
The Plaintiff has raised this issue numerous times before. The Courts, and the Arizona State Bar have simply refused to take any action against Daniel Brenden for his deliberate and constant violations of Ethics Rules.
...
Therefore, the Court (and the Plaintiff) can NOT recognize Daniel Brenden (or anyone else) as their "Counsel". Daniel Brenden is a witness in this case and therefore is barred from representing ANYONE (including Medlin, Peterson, & Ramsey).
...
Daniel Brenden, Maricopa County Attorney's Office NOTICE OF ASSOCIATION TO COUNSEL
...
SIGNED Order Directing Plaintiff to cease communication with Defendants and send ALL communications to Defendant's counsel (Maricopa County Attorney Daniel Brenden).
...
Daniel Brenden, Maricopa County Attorney's Office
...
Daniel Brenden, Maricopa County Attorney's Office
...
Daniel Brenden, Maricopa County Attorney's Office
...
***NOTE*** The Plaintiff filed a "Motion to Compel Withdrawal of Counsel" against Daniel Brenden because he was listed as a crucial witness in this case.
...
Daniel Brenden, Maricopa County Attorney's Office
...
One that includes a WRITTEN entry of his DENIAL of the Motion to Compel Withdrawal Of Counsel and Sanctions (against Daniel Brenden).
***NOTE*** While Judge Jones does agree to "sign" his rulings, he in fact has his name typed into the signature line. Even MORE IMPORTANT to the issue(s), he does NOT make ANY mention of his DENIAL of the Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Withdrawal Of Counsel and Sanctions (against Daniel Brenden).
...
Daniel Brenden, Maricopa County Attorney's Office ADOPTION OF RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR SIGNED RULINGS
...
Daniel Brenden, Maricopa County Attorney's Office ADOPTION OF RESPONSE TO MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT
...
Daniel Brenden, Maricopa County Attorney's Office ADOPTION OF RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING
...
Daniel Brenden, Maricopa County Attorney's Office
...
Daniel Brenden, Maricopa County Attorney's Office
...
Daniel Brenden, Maricopa County Attorney's Office -
2. The First Whistleblower: Maricopa County Merit Commission Case Index
www.thefirstwhistleblower.org/ - [Cached]Published on: 6/2/2005 Last Visited: 9/1/2007
Notice of Witnesses: The Complainant notifies the Commission that Daniel Brenden & Mary Cronin of the Maricopa County Attorney's Office will be called as witnesses in this matter.
...
Daniel Brenden, Maricopa County Deputy Attorney Subject:Refusal to release Public Records Daniel Brenden, in a clear confilct of interest as violation of Arizona laws, not only is representing the Defendants in a case in which he is a witness, but, is also acting is legal counsel for the Maricopa County Merit Commission. On behalf of the Merit Commission, Mr. Brenden writes to the Complainant, refusing to release ANY Public Records to the Complainant.
07/21/2004 View .PDF File MCWB040721 Daniel Brenden, Maricopa County Attorney's Office
...
In direct and deliberate defiance of the Complainant's notice that Daniel Brenden & Mary Cronin (Deputy County Attorneys) will be called as witnesses, they both file a Notice of Appearance asserting themselves as counsel for the Defendants/Respondents.
...
In response to the Complainant's notice to the Commission (and Hearing Officer David J. Gering) concerning the unlawful appearance of Deputy County Attorneys Daniel Brenden & Mary C. Cronin, Mr. Gering vacates the July 28 2004 "Prehearing CONFERENCE" and orders briefs to be submitted on the subjects of the unlawful appearance of Brenden & Cronin, and, on the Complainant's request for a "Change of Venue".
...
Daniel Brenden, Maricopa County Attorney's Office
...
Daniel Brenden (or Mary Cronin, it is unclear which) file a response to the Complainant's assertion that they should be disqualified as counsel because they will be witnesses in this case. (ie. Arizona State Bar Ethics Rules are irrelevant to the wishes of Maricopa County Attorney Richard Romley.)
...
Daniel Brenden, counsel for the Defendants files responds to Complainant's Motion for Default Judgment, and, files a motion to dismiss. Rather then send it to the Complainant so that he may response, Daniel Brenden deliberately sends it to the WRONG ADDRESS!
09/28/2004 MCWB04092802 Defendants RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND CROSS MOTION TO DISMISS
In attempt to have the matter quietly and expiditiously dismissed, Daniel Brenden, counsel for the Defendants files a terse motion to dismiss, and then, rather then send it to the Complainant so that he may response, Daniel Brenden deliberately sends it to the WRONG ADDRESS!
...
***IMPORTANT*** It is also learned at the hearing that counsel for the Defendants (Daniel Brenden) has filed motions to dismiss the case, BUT, DELIBERATELY withheld them from the Complaintant by sending the to the WRONG ADDRESS!
...
Counsel for the Defendants (Daniel Brenden) files a new Motion To Dismiss. In it (and against Az. Bar Ethics Rules), Brenden submits as "evidence" copies of rulings from another case, with are currently UNDER APPEAL!
...
After MONTHS for refusing all disclosure to the Complainant, and refusing to produce County employees as witnesses requested by the Complainant, and AFTER the hearing continuance is cancelled, Daniel Brenden (counsel for Defendants), NOW wishes to supplement the record with evidence and witnesses previously withheld. -
3. www.thefirstwhistleblower.net
www.thefirstwhistleblower.net/ - [Cached]Published on: 6/2/2005 Last Visited: 3/8/2007
Notice of Witnesses: The Complainant notifies the Commission that Daniel Brenden & Mary Cronin of the Maricopa County Attorney's Office will be called as witnesses in this matter.
...
Daniel Brenden, Maricopa County Deputy Attorney Subject:Refusal to release Public Records Daniel Brenden, in a clear confilct of interest as violation of Arizona laws, not only is representing the Defendants in a case in which he is a witness, but, is also acting is legal counsel for the Maricopa County Merit Commission. On behalf of the Merit Commission, Mr. Brenden writes to the Complainant, refusing to release ANY Public Records to the Complainant.
07/21/2004 View .PDF File MCWB040721 Daniel Brenden, Maricopa County Attorney's Office
...
In direct and deliberate defiance of the Complainant's notice that Daniel Brenden & Mary Cronin (Deputy County Attorneys) will be called as witnesses, they both file a Notice of Appearance asserting themselves as counsel for the Defendants/Respondents.
...
In response to the Complainant's notice to the Commission (and Hearing Officer David J. Gering) concerning the unlawful appearance of Deputy County Attorneys Daniel Brenden & Mary C. Cronin, Mr. Gering vacates the July 28 2004 "Prehearing CONFERENCE" and orders briefs to be submitted on the subjects of the unlawful appearance of Brenden & Cronin, and, on the Complainant's request for a "Change of Venue".
...
Daniel Brenden, Maricopa County Attorney's Office
...
Daniel Brenden (or Mary Cronin, it is unclear which) file a response to the Complainant's assertion that they should be disqualified as counsel because they will be witnesses in this case. (ie. Arizona State Bar Ethics Rules are irrelevant to the wishes of Maricopa County Attorney Richard Romley.)
...
Daniel Brenden, counsel for the Defendants files responds to Complainant's Motion for Default Judgment, and, files a motion to dismiss. Rather then send it to the Complainant so that he may response, Daniel Brenden deliberately sends it to the WRONG ADDRESS!
09/28/2004 MCWB04092802 Defendants RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND CROSS MOTION TO DISMISS
In attempt to have the matter quietly and expiditiously dismissed, Daniel Brenden, counsel for the Defendants files a terse motion to dismiss, and then, rather then send it to the Complainant so that he may response, Daniel Brenden deliberately sends it to the WRONG ADDRESS!
...
***IMPORTANT*** It is also learned at the hearing that counsel for the Defendants (Daniel Brenden) has filed motions to dismiss the case, BUT, DELIBERATELY withheld them from the Complaintant by sending the to the WRONG ADDRESS!
...
Counsel for the Defendants (Daniel Brenden) files a new Motion To Dismiss. In it (and against Az. Bar Ethics Rules), Brenden submits as "evidence" copies of rulings from another case, with are currently UNDER APPEAL!
...
After MONTHS for refusing all disclosure to the Complainant, and refusing to produce County employees as witnesses requested by the Complainant, and AFTER the hearing continuance is cancelled, Daniel Brenden (counsel for Defendants), NOW wishes to supplement the record with evidence and witnesses previously withheld.
