massteacher.org/archive/2004/news_2004-09-15.cfm -
[Cached Version]
Published on: 9/15/2004
Last Visited: 12/4/2008
"While some of the schools on this list may truly be struggling and in need of assistance from the state, many others are undoubtedly fine schools that were simply tripped up by the complicated and inflexible provisions of the so-called No Child Left Behind Act," said MTA President Catherine A. Boudreau.
"By labeling more and more schools in need of improvement each year," she added, "this law falsely implies we have a crisis in education and a rapid decline in the quality of public education.
That couldn't be further from the truth."
MTA released data that show Massachusetts students rank first or near the top on virtually all major measures of achievement -- except NCLB.
"In 2003, Massachusetts was ranked 'the smartest state' in the country based on the quality of our public schools, and it's easy to see why," said Boudreau.
...
"These data show that increased funding for our schools, the adoption of state standards and hard work by educators and students under the Massachusetts Education Reform Act are paying off," said Boudreau.
"Unfortunately, the list of schools failing to meet arbitrary federal standards grows every year no matter how well we do according to other indicators.
Mislabeling schools hurts morale and undermines support for public education.
The confusion and burdensome paperwork also divert time and resources away from pursuing the goal that all educators share: to make sure we leave no child behind."
Boudreau said that despite these indicators of success, there is still a significant achievement gap in Massachusetts, and we have a long way to go to ensure that all children have an opportunity to succeed in our schools.
"On average, our students do very well, but averages can mask the reality that many schools need more resources and help to provide students with the high-quality education to which they are entitled."
Boudreau criticized the federal government for failing to fully fund NCLB.
"President Bush has not sought, and Congress has not approved, the full amount of funding that Congress deemed necessary to adequately fund this law," said Boudreau.
"As a result, districts are scrambling for scarce resources to pay for the new mandates.
Adding insult to injury, when schools are labeled 'in need of improvement' they are expected to divert federal Title I funds away from the classroom to transportation in order to fund the school-choice requirements or to after-school tutoring."
Boudreau further noted that the harshest sanctions under NCLB call for school restructuring, which could include turning public schools over to a for-profit management company or turning them into charter schools.
"There is absolutely no evidence that for-profit managers do a better job of teaching our children than do experienced educators," said Boudreau.
"In addition, there is powerful new evidence based on federal test score data that, on average, public school students nationwide outperform their demographically similar charter school peers."
Boudreau said that MTA and the National Education Association are calling on Congress and the White House to fix the seriously flawed federal law.