Please Note:
This profile was automatically generated using 14 references found on the Internet. This information has not been verified. Learn more...
This profile was automatically generated using 14 references found on the Internet. This information has not been verified. Learn more...
View all 14 references Web References
-
1. www.church-software.com
www.church-software.com/christ - [Cached]Published on: 11/10/2007 Last Visited: 11/10/2007
68. - Some Strictures on a late Treatise, called, 'A Fair and Rational Vindication of the Right of Infants to the Ordinance of Baptism.' Written by David Bostwick, A. M. late Minister of the Presbyterian Church in the City of New York. -
2. The Baptist Standard Bearer, Inc.
www.standardbearer.org/gill/gi - [Cached]Published on: 3/31/2006 Last Visited: 4/18/2007
Written by David Bostwick, A.M.
Late Minister of the Presbyterian Church in the City of New-York
...
The controversy lying beyond the seas, I chose it should continue there, and therefore never reprinted and republished my Reply here, though it has been solicited; but of late Mr. Clark's Defense has been sent over here, and published, and advertised to be sold; which is the only reason of my reprinting and republishing the following Reply; to which I have added some scriptures on a treatise of Mr. Bostwick's on the same subject, imported from America, with the above Defense, and here reprinted. -
3. The Baptist Standard Bearer, Inc.
www.standardbearer.org/gill/gi - [Cached]Published on: 3/31/2006 Last Visited: 4/18/2007
Strictures on Mr. Bostwick's
...
Along with Mr. Clark's Defense of the divine Right of Infant-baptism, to which what is written above is a Reply, there has been imported from America a treatise called, A fair and rational Vindication of the Right of Infants to the Ordinance of Baptism; being the substance of several discourses from Acts 2:39, by David Bostwick, A.M. late minister of the Presbyterian church in the city of New York, which has been reprinted and published here; and as it comes in company with the former, it is but a piece of civility to take some notice of it, and make some few strictures (severe criticisms, ed.) upon it, though there is nothing in it but what is answered in the above Reply; to which I shall greatly refer the reader.

