wanewscouncil.org/spokane-final/final-report.html -
[Cached Version]
Last Visited: 6/1/2008
A more detailed analysis of the paper's early handling of RPS was done in 1998 by Stephen Blewett, head of the journalism program at Eastern Washington University.Blewett, a former Spokesman-Review reporter and editor, examined the paper's RPS coverage for 1997, a critical year, when the city was deciding whether to join the Cowles in the mall's makeover.
His conclusion: During that year, the paper's coverage was heavily weighted in favor of the project.
Blewett's analysis broke down The Spokesman-Review coverage into nine categories.RPS proponents received the most favorable treatment in seven; the paper's coverage was rated neutral in two others, and none favored the project's critics.
Where "more pro-development speakers were cited, they were more often cited first, and there were more of them cited in the stories.And when the story was predominantly ,pro,' it was more often in a prominent location in the newspaper" (audio file).
Blewett does not believe that the Cowles family deliberately set out to bias its newspaper's RPS coverage.But he singled out the paper's longstanding "no surprises" policy, permitting Stacey Cowles, and sometimes Betsy Cowles, to review and direct the editing of stories that involved the family and its enterprises.In addition to raising conflicts of interest, Blewett concluded, the policy was likely to lead to self-censorship by newspaper staffers.