Downloading for Democracy- By Kim Zetter [Archive] -... -
[Cached Version]
Published on: 7/19/2004
Last Visited: 6/6/2009
Thad Anderson, a second-year student at St. John's School of Law in Queens, New York, said he was driven to launch the site by what he says is the current administration's disregard for fundamental democratic structures and its increasing practice of withholding information from the public.
He wanted to give people access to crucial data about what elected officials were doing.
"I really think this is a crucial point, during my lifetime, for people to really look at what's going on with the government and make it be more accountable for what it's doing," he said.
"The president and vice president have used executive privilege to withhold documents that almost every president for the last 30 or 40 years has released."
Anderson didn't intend to make a statement by using P2P networks, but his use of the networks to deliver the data counters the usual government and entertainment industry arguments that P2P networks have no value, apart from stealing copyright works, and therefore should be outlawed.
In this case, the P2P networks are promoting public knowledge and doing so in a way that makes it easy for people to obtain all related documents swiftly with a single mouseclick.
Although all of the documents on Anderson's site are available elsewhere, they are buried deep in government and court sites or scattered among the sites of various government watchdog groups and media outlets.
It took Anderson about four hours and 2,000 mouseclicks to download more than 13,000 documents related to Vice President Dick Cheney's energy task force from the National Resources Defense Council's website and from Judicial Watch.
...
But the entire document and other documents were redacted so heavily there was really no point in the Energy Department releasing it," Anderson said.
Anderson said that seeing the documents themselves, rather than reading about them through the filter of a news article, has a greater impact.
"It's a very direct and primary source when you read (these documents) without any spin," he said.
...
Although Anderson is a Democrat, his site supports no particular political stance.
It doesn't need to, he says, because the principles behind it find support among people of all political beliefs.
"There's a lot of people of both parties and independent parties who are saying that the things Bush has done on a number of issues is going beyond what mainstream Americans are willing to go along with," Anderson said.
Anderson said his goal is to help people obtain the information they need to speak up about what the government is doing wrong.
He's encouraged that more and more people are doing so.