Give us power, what would separatists say... -
[Cached Version]
Published on: 10/29/2005
Last Visited: 10/29/2005
How naïve and self deceiving is to draw an imaginary link between the aspirations of people and the demands of politicians, Hilal Ahmad reacts to an article by Sadiq Ali published in Greater Kashmir
...
Sadiq Ali, the member of Legislative Council, is known as an urbane, well-read politician with a penchant for frequently changing loyalties to political parties.He has been member of National Conference and Congress in the past.So it is no surprise to see him now as PDP's cheerleader warning New Delhi that it would be committing suicide if Congress takes over the reins of power. ("What do we need?"Greater Kashmir, October 23). To make his point, Sadiq Ali makes a cocktail of rhetoric, unfounded praise, and the most potent weapon of so-called mainstream political parties, that is, to warn India that it would lose Kashmir if they were not heard, meaning if they are allowed to continue in chair. Willy-nilly, Kashmiris now have a chief minister from Jammu, a man who has spent most of his political life serving New Delhi.His acquaintance with Kashmir is no more than military men who spent decades of their active service in Kashmir.In this backdrop, Sadiq Ali's article is an interesting pamphlet that unwittingly exposes the democracy in Kashmir that never could mature. "In the past all the Chief Ministers were accused of being central agents who spoke and understood only the Delhi language.The new incumbent was different.For the first time the people felt that we had a Chief Minister who had his own mind," Sadiq Ali writes.
...
I wonder how Sadiq Ali came to the conclusion that "for the first time people felt that we had a chief minister who had his own mind."How do you perceive people's ‘feeling' when you need the support of nearly a million troops, hundreds of thousands of government employees, and a paid army of henchmen for the elections?Or is it that you want to say your Congress partners would be seen as Indian agents if they were allowed to rule?The complex political situation in Kashmir has automatically set-up a mechanism whereby any politician pandering to New Delhi's interests overtly (Bakshi, Sadiq, Dr Farooq Abdullah), covertly (like Mufti), or reluctantly (like Sheikh Abdullah), becomes a refuse.
...
Sadiq Ali "doesn't find a single instance where PDP has deviated from the promises it made in its election manifesto."Political lies were not told so brazenly before.The chief minister and his ministers are more diplomatic than Sadiq Ali.
...
Be it the opening of the Muzaffarabad Road, withdrawal of all the draconian laws, Indo-Pak relations, or "Peace with Dignity", anybody else in his place with barely 17 members would hesitate to tread a path that went against the declared national policy," Sadiq Ali emphatically writes. If only expression suffices, Sheikh Muhammad Abdullah fought for Kashmir's right to self-determination for nearly two decades and people rallied behind him too.He was jailed too.Mufti was Delhi's man even then and when Kashmiris revloted en masse in the late eighties to demand freedom, Mufti was the home minister who dealt the first blow to that popular movement.As home minister he is on record saying in Bijbehara that " Kashmiris have smaller weapons while India has bigger weapons" or "tanks would respond to bullets."Isn't it surprising that while the Muzaffarabad road was symbolically opened up, not a single repressive law was repealed even though Mufti is giving an impression that everything is OK and pleads foreign nations to send their citizens as tourists?Sadiq Ali says Mufti has dared to express himself on issues "that went against the declared national policy."Isn't it shameful in the first place to endorse the policies, and implement them too, that call for enforcement of repressive laws?Isn't it a contradiction of sorts that chief minister Mufti Muhammad Sayed, is lauded for expression even though he is the chairman of the largest internal security grid in the world, that is, the United Head Quarters, comprising army, paramilitary forces, police, intelligence agencies, that oversees every gunfight and counterinsurgency operation.Did his ‘expression' on the rape of a ten-year old girl in Handwara restored "peace with dignity" to lakhs of Kashmiris whose protest was crushed with force? Mufti is the first leader whose policies have been endorsed globally, Sadiq Ali says.National and International media has been favourable to the present dispensation, for reasons well known.A European Union delegation termed Kashmir a beautiful prison.It is another question that a manufactured reality can be passed off.There is nothing unique in such an endorsement.It has been accorded to a select group of journalists and renegade militant commanders who regularly frequent Brussels and Washington to push forward a particular point of view for which they get paid. One wonder when in Mufti's rule "our youth were convinced of the futility of gun."Surely they might have whispered it in the ears of Sadiq Ali.Otherwise, the largest number of Kashmiri militant commanders (particularly of Hizbul Mujahideen) wouldn't have been killed in Mufti's time than in comparable period of time before.That too, when "peace is around" and there is no let up in bloodshed. Early in his article he says that "with peace process was moving forward some semblance of normalcy was visible everywhere.
...
Sadiq Ali's article brings into being the suppressed actualities of Kashmir situation that have been buried under a misperceived reality for the past 57 years.