nrapr3 -
[Cached Version]
Published on: 8/8/2001
Last Visited: 12/22/2002
During his testimony, William Adams, PFB's Director of Natural Resources, stressed the importance of updating the state water plan and obtaining current data on water resources in order to create a meaningful water plan for Pennsylvania.
"We believe agriculture should be given priority in water use during emergency situations," Adams said."Unlike many water users, agriculture's need for continuous use of water is critical.Livestock and crops naturally need to utilize significant amounts of water for maintenance of their health and well being.
"If a water plan is created that would interrupt or reduce farmers' water use, even for short periods, the impact on agricultural production and farmers' economic welfare would be disastrous."
...
We strongly recommend that no fees be imposed upon water users who may need to register," said Adams.
Adams testified that, water legislation should prohibit local governmental regulation over water use."Clearly coordinated water use planning cannot be accomplished through action of individual municipalities.Water flow does not stop at the township's borders."
In addition, Farm Bureau advocates the establishment of regional water boards as the key agencies in water planning."Regional water boards should have the sole authority to write water plans for all areas in a designated region with approval by an independent state water board," said Adams.
The Pennsylvania State Grange and the Soil Conservation Service also presented testimony on behalf of agriculture.Pennsylvania Farm Bureau is a voluntary, general farm organization that represents over 28,000 farm and rural families.
# # #