About | Free Trial

Last Update

2015-12-01T00:00:00.000Z

This profile was last updated on . .

Is this you? Claim your profile.

Background Information

Employment History

Chief of Police

Mechanicsburg Police Department

Enforcement Training Specialist

Ohio Peace Officer Training Academy

Affiliations

Advisory Board Member
Police

Advisory Board Member
BlackHawk Industries Inc

Member of Advisory Board
CorrectionsOne

Education



Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction's Training Academy

Fourth Degree Black Belt
Shorin Ryu Karate

M.A.

undergraduate degree

Hiram College

Web References (46 Total References)


There had been two previous break-ins ...

www.springfieldnewssun.com [cached]

There had been two previous break-ins at the business in previous months, Mechanicsburg Police Chief Sam Faulkner said.


Samuel D. Faulkner (Police ...

www.mrrlaw.com [cached]

Samuel D. Faulkner (Police Chief of Mechanicsburg): "'Reasonable Force' Defined"


Government Liability Seminar | : Seminar for the Ohio Association of Civil Trial AttorneysMazanec, Raskin & Ryder Co., L.P.A.

www.mrrlaw.com [cached]

Samuel D. Faulkner (Police Chief of Mechanicsburg): "'Reasonable Force' Defined"


The latest newsletter from the Force ...

dsam-mi.org [cached]

The latest newsletter from the Force Science Research Center tells of a website started by an instructor at the Ohio Peace Officers Training Academy and Lieutenant with the Mechanicsburg, Ohio Police Department, Sam Faulkner, who is trying to define the answer to the question, "What is a "reasonable" use of force?"

...
When the U.S. Supreme Court declared in its landmark case Graham v. Connor that force used by law officers must be "objectively reasonable," Sam Faulkner had a question:
What's "reasonable"?
The Court provided "no definitive answer regarding what a reasonable officer is or does," says Faulkner, an instructor at the Ohio Peace Officers Training Academy and a lieutenant with the Mechanicsburg (OH) PD.
...
The 59-year-old Faulkner has made it his life mission to de-fog the ambiguity of Graham and provide well-defined guidelines that are supported by most officers and most civilians alike as to what constitutes "reasonable" police responses in force confrontations.
...
Already, appearing as an expert witness in civil suits, Faulkner says he has successfully used the survey results in more than 260 cases to help defeat plaintiffs' exaggerated claims of excessive force.
"When a plaintiff's expert testifies against an officer, he basically has a personal opinion and his resume to back it up," Faulkner told Force Science News. "By getting the survey introduced into evidence, the defendant officer usually can show that thousands of his fellow professionals, as well as a cross-section of ordinary civilians, concur that his actions were appropriate, given the circumstances he faced. That's tough for a plaintiff to overcome."
Faulkner started his poll in 1990 as a pencil-and-paper survey conducted among his classes at the Ohio state academy, but he quickly sought a broader test group. "The first year, I put more than 30,000 miles on my personal car, plus air miles, traveling to other states" to capture officers' opinions, he recalls. In some cases, he has surveyed entire agencies, large and small, on site. But it's the Internet that has given him his widest reach. He says he has surveyed officers from every state and from hundreds of agencies, municipal through federal, and civilians from communities in every region of the country.
...
On the day recently when Faulkner walked us through the survey, the cumulative results from both officers and civilians taking the test were identical.
...
"This can be tremendously helpful to an officer whose responsible reaction to resistance gets challenged and becomes a focus of controversy," Faulkner explains. Scenario #4, for instance, involves a subject who is "striking or kicking the officer. One of the response options listed is the Vascular Neck Restraint "(a 'sleeper' or control hold, a rear neck lock, not a choke hold). That technique might be considered controversial, if not strictly off limits, in some jurisdictions. Yet 95% of officer and civilian respondents alike have included it among the options they consider reasonable for managing suspects who are resisting arrest by kicking and striking.
As part of his crusade to broaden his database and thereby even more solidly define what can be acceptable as reasonable, Faulkner would like to see certain modifications of the language with which administrators, trainers, and individual officers address force issues.
For one thing, he discredits the term "use of force.
...
"The years of dedication that Sam Faulkner has given to enlightening us on the meaning of 'reasonable' is truly admirable. His insights and explanations of his research results are informative and revealing. I encourage all our readers who have not yet taken Sam's questionnaire to do so, see how their answers compare with those of other officers and civilians, and review his analysis of his data."
A 128-page on-line book, covering Faulkner's detailed analysis of results from his reasonable reactions survey can be accessed free of charge here http://www.ag.state.oh.us/le


The latest newsletter from the Force ...

dsam-mi.org [cached]

The latest newsletter from the Force Science Research Center tells of a website started by an instructor at the Ohio Peace Officers Training Academy and Lieutenant with the Mechanicsburg, Ohio Police Department, Sam Faulkner, who is trying to define the answer to the question, "What is a "reasonable" use of force?"

...
When the U.S. Supreme Court declared in its landmark case Graham v. Connor that force used by law officers must be "objectively reasonable," Sam Faulkner had a question:
What's "reasonable"?
The Court provided "no definitive answer regarding what a reasonable officer is or does," says Faulkner, an instructor at the Ohio Peace Officers Training Academy and a lieutenant with the Mechanicsburg (OH) PD.
...
The 59-year-old Faulkner has made it his life mission to de-fog the ambiguity of Graham and provide well-defined guidelines that are supported by most officers and most civilians alike as to what constitutes "reasonable" police responses in force confrontations.
...
Already, appearing as an expert witness in civil suits, Faulkner says he has successfully used the survey results in more than 260 cases to help defeat plaintiffs' exaggerated claims of excessive force.
"When a plaintiff's expert testifies against an officer, he basically has a personal opinion and his resume to back it up," Faulkner told Force Science News. "By getting the survey introduced into evidence, the defendant officer usually can show that thousands of his fellow professionals, as well as a cross-section of ordinary civilians, concur that his actions were appropriate, given the circumstances he faced. That's tough for a plaintiff to overcome."
Faulkner started his poll in 1990 as a pencil-and-paper survey conducted among his classes at the Ohio state academy, but he quickly sought a broader test group. "The first year, I put more than 30,000 miles on my personal car, plus air miles, traveling to other states" to capture officers' opinions, he recalls. In some cases, he has surveyed entire agencies, large and small, on site. But it's the Internet that has given him his widest reach. He says he has surveyed officers from every state and from hundreds of agencies, municipal through federal, and civilians from communities in every region of the country.
...
On the day recently when Faulkner walked us through the survey, the cumulative results from both officers and civilians taking the test were identical.
...
"This can be tremendously helpful to an officer whose responsible reaction to resistance gets challenged and becomes a focus of controversy," Faulkner explains. Scenario #4, for instance, involves a subject who is "striking or kicking the officer. One of the response options listed is the Vascular Neck Restraint "(a 'sleeper' or control hold, a rear neck lock, not a choke hold). That technique might be considered controversial, if not strictly off limits, in some jurisdictions. Yet 95% of officer and civilian respondents alike have included it among the options they consider reasonable for managing suspects who are resisting arrest by kicking and striking.
As part of his crusade to broaden his database and thereby even more solidly define what can be acceptable as reasonable, Faulkner would like to see certain modifications of the language with which administrators, trainers, and individual officers address force issues.
For one thing, he discredits the term "use of force.
...
"The years of dedication that Sam Faulkner has given to enlightening us on the meaning of 'reasonable' is truly admirable. His insights and explanations of his research results are informative and revealing. I encourage all our readers who have not yet taken Sam's questionnaire to do so, see how their answers compare with those of other officers and civilians, and review his analysis of his data."
A 128-page on-line book, covering Faulkner's detailed analysis of results from his reasonable reactions survey can be accessed free of charge here http://www.ag.state.oh.us/le

Similar Profiles

Other People with this Name

Other people with the name Faulkner

Peter Faulkner
Fawcett Funeral Home

Alex Faulkner
The Ad Plain Ltd

Charlotte Faulkner

Lorie Faulkner
LiFT Academy

Cissy Faulkner
Brock-McVey Company

Browse ZoomInfo's Business Contact Directory by City

Browse ZoomInfo's
Business People Directory

Browse ZoomInfo's
Advanced Company Directory