About | Free Trial

Last Update

2015-08-28T00:00:00.000Z

This profile was last updated on .

Is this you? Claim your profile.

Wrong Salim Kara?

Mr. Salim Kara

Founder, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

myiStamp Inc.

Direct Phone: (905) ***-****       

Get ZoomInfo Grow

+ Get 10 Free Contacts a Month

I agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. I understand that I will receive a subscription to ZoomInfo Community Edition at no charge in exchange for downloading and installing the ZoomInfo Contact Contributor utility which, among other features, involves sharing my business contacts as well as headers and signature blocks from emails that I receive.

myiStamp Inc.

Background Information

Employment History

Founder, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Kara Technology

Affiliations

Founder
E-Stamp Corporation

Web References (21 Total References)


:: K A R A T e c h n o l o g y ::

www.karatechnology.com [cached]

Salim G. Kara, Chairman and CEO Salim Kara is an accomplished inventor with dozens of patents worldwide. He is the inventor of PC-based postage, an idea that resulted in his founding of E-Stamp Corp. in 1994. In his role as founder of E-Stamp, Kara managed all aspects of the company's phenomenal growth, including engineering, fund-raising, intellectual property, staffing and the Company's critical partnership with the United States Postal Service. Mr. Kara was recently honored with the first Retail Postage Technology Award at the Spring National Postal Forum in Nashville, Tenn. The Retail Postage Technology Award recognizes technology leaders who have shown the leadership and willingness to assist the U.S. Postal Service in developing information technologies that enhance services, reduce costs, and are dedicated to advancing postal service as a business solution. Mr. Kara also holds the prestigious "Future 500--Upside Award" for technical innovation from the University of Houston, Center for Entrepreneurship and Innovation.


:: K A R A T e c h n o l o g y ::

www.karatechnology.com [cached]

Mr. Salim G. Kara, Chairman and CEO Salim Kara is an accomplished inventor with dozens of patents worldwide. He is the inventor of PC-based postage, an idea that resulted in his founding of E-Stamp Corp. in 1994. In his role as founder of E-Stamp, Kara managed all aspects of the company's phenomenal growth, including engineering, fund-raising, intellectual property, staffing and the Company's critical partnership with the United States Postal Service. Mr. Kara was recently honored with the first Retail Postage Technology Award at the Spring National Postal Forum in Nashville, Tenn. The Retail Postage Technology Award recognizes technology leaders who have shown the leadership and willingness to assist the U.S. Postal Service in developing information technologies that enhance services, reduce costs, and are dedicated to advancing postal service as a business solution. Mr. Kara also holds the prestigious "Future 500--Upside Award" for technical innovation from the University of Houston, Center for Entrepreneurship and Innovation.


:: K A R A T e c h n o l o g y ::

www.karatechnology.com [cached]

Salim G. Kara Chairman & CEO


Publications & Events - Amster Rothstein & Ebenstein, LLP - Intellectual Property Law

www.arelaw.com [cached]

Although Kara involves many issues, the present discussion is limited to the issues involving the NDA.

Facts
Salim Kara is the sole inventor on two related patents, US Patent Nos 6,505,179 (the '179 patent) and 6,735,575 (the '575 patent), directed toward apparatuses and methods that allow a customer to print a secured document (such as a stamp or an airline ticket) at home using preprinted label sheets.
Stamps.com offers internet-based shipping and postage services.
In May 2000, Stamps.com approached Kara to collaborate on Kara's Personal Computer-based (PC-based) stamp technology. The two entered into an NDA that provided in pertinent part that:
Stamps.com 'keep secret and not disclose ... and not use for its own use in any capacity whatsoever any Confidential Information for any purpose other than for the purpose for which such information was disclosed' (ie to facilitate 'business discussions'). 3. Stamps.com was not permitted to 'make written, electronic, or photostatic copies or excerpts of or summaries of Confidential Information' without prior written consent from Kara. 'Confidential information shall not include ... [i]nformation which becomes part of the public knowledge through no breach of this Agreement or any similar obligations known by [Stamps.com]'. Texas law governed the NDA.
Stamps.com subsequently indicated it was no longer interested in pursuing a business relationship with Kara. However, in October 2001, Stamps.com announced that the US Postal Service had approved beta testing of its PC-based postage product. Stamps.com launched the Pre-V5 product commercially in July 2002, and the V5 line 3 years later.
Kara brought suit against Stamps.com in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York for patent infringement, breach of contract, and other claims not relevant to the appeal. The case was eventually transferred to the US District Court for the Central District of California, where Stamps.com counterclaimed for, inter alia, patent invalidity and unenforceability and moved for summary judgment on Kara's breach of contract claim.
As pertinent to the breach of contract claim, Kara asserted two alleged breaches of the NDA:
...
Kara alleged that the first breach occurred on 15 May 2000, but did not first bring suit until 22 October 2004, more than 4 years later. The district court found that this breach of contract claim was barred by the 4-year statute of limitation under Texas law. Since this note-taking was done in front of Kara employees at the meeting, the Federal Circuit agreed with the district court that the statute of limitations barred Kara from asserting this breach.
However, with respect to the second alleged breach (ie Stamps.com's alleged misuse of Kara's confidential information to make its own systems), the Federal Circuit noted that the district court did not address whether this claim was barred by statute of limitations. Based on disputes between the parties as to when Kara first learned or should have learned of facts identifying this alleged breach, the Federal Circuit found that there were material facts in dispute that precluded summary judgment on that point.
The Federal Circuit found that there were material facts in dispute as to the timing and content of other alleged public disclosures by Kara of the confidential information, which was the subject of the second alleged breach. The Federal Circuit also noted that, even if Kara subsequently disclosed 8 days after the meeting with Stamps.com the confidential information to another party in Finland and later openly at the World Stemp Expo, thus relieving Stamps.com of its obligation not to use the confidential information, 'Stamps.com still could be liable for a breach of contract claim based on the eight days before the May 23 presentation'. With respect to the content of disclosures by Kara at subsequent presentations, the Federal Circuit explained:
Furthermore, material factual disputes exist concerning what was disclosed at the Finland presentation and what one skilled in the art would have understood from Kara's exhibit at the World Stamp Expo. It is unclear from Kara's slides from its Finland presentation whether the public would understand how to create a secure document, or how those documents are later validated. Further, although there was testimony Kara's exhibit at the World Stamp Expo included a full demonstration, there was also testimony that Kara struggled to get its demonstration to work.
...
Kara reminds us that while NDAs are important protection that should be entered into before disclosing confidential information with respect to a potential business relationship, an NDA by itself may not be sufficient protection against misappropriation by the prospective business partner.


Publications & Events - Amster Rothstein & Ebenstein, LLP - Intellectual Property Law

www.arelaw.com [cached]

Although Kara involves many issues, the present discussion is limited to the issues involving the NDA.

Facts
Salim Kara is the sole inventor on two related patents, US Patent Nos 6,505,179 (the '179 patent) and 6,735,575 (the '575 patent), directed toward apparatuses and methods that allow a customer to print a secured document (such as a stamp or an airline ticket) at home using preprinted label sheets.
Stamps.com offers internet-based shipping and postage services.
In May 2000, Stamps.com approached Kara to collaborate on Kara's Personal Computer-based (PC-based) stamp technology. The two entered into an NDA that provided in pertinent part that:
Stamps.com 'keep secret and not disclose ... and not use for its own use in any capacity whatsoever any Confidential Information for any purpose other than for the purpose for which such information was disclosed' (ie to facilitate 'business discussions'). 3. Stamps.com was not permitted to 'make written, electronic, or photostatic copies or excerpts of or summaries of Confidential Information' without prior written consent from Kara. 'Confidential information shall not include ... [i]nformation which becomes part of the public knowledge through no breach of this Agreement or any similar obligations known by [Stamps.com]'. Texas law governed the NDA.
Stamps.com subsequently indicated it was no longer interested in pursuing a business relationship with Kara. However, in October 2001, Stamps.com announced that the US Postal Service had approved beta testing of its PC-based postage product. Stamps.com launched the Pre-V5 product commercially in July 2002, and the V5 line 3 years later.
Kara brought suit against Stamps.com in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York for patent infringement, breach of contract, and other claims not relevant to the appeal. The case was eventually transferred to the US District Court for the Central District of California, where Stamps.com counterclaimed for, inter alia, patent invalidity and unenforceability and moved for summary judgment on Kara's breach of contract claim.
As pertinent to the breach of contract claim, Kara asserted two alleged breaches of the NDA:
...
Kara alleged that the first breach occurred on 15 May 2000, but did not first bring suit until 22 October 2004, more than 4 years later. The district court found that this breach of contract claim was barred by the 4-year statute of limitation under Texas law. Since this note-taking was done in front of Kara employees at the meeting, the Federal Circuit agreed with the district court that the statute of limitations barred Kara from asserting this breach.
However, with respect to the second alleged breach (ie Stamps.com's alleged misuse of Kara's confidential information to make its own systems), the Federal Circuit noted that the district court did not address whether this claim was barred by statute of limitations. Based on disputes between the parties as to when Kara first learned or should have learned of facts identifying this alleged breach, the Federal Circuit found that there were material facts in dispute that precluded summary judgment on that point.
The Federal Circuit found that there were material facts in dispute as to the timing and content of other alleged public disclosures by Kara of the confidential information, which was the subject of the second alleged breach. The Federal Circuit also noted that, even if Kara subsequently disclosed 8 days after the meeting with Stamps.com the confidential information to another party in Finland and later openly at the World Stemp Expo, thus relieving Stamps.com of its obligation not to use the confidential information, 'Stamps.com still could be liable for a breach of contract claim based on the eight days before the May 23 presentation'. With respect to the content of disclosures by Kara at subsequent presentations, the Federal Circuit explained:
Furthermore, material factual disputes exist concerning what was disclosed at the Finland presentation and what one skilled in the art would have understood from Kara's exhibit at the World Stamp Expo. It is unclear from Kara's slides from its Finland presentation whether the public would understand how to create a secure document, or how those documents are later validated. Further, although there was testimony Kara's exhibit at the World Stamp Expo included a full demonstration, there was also testimony that Kara struggled to get its demonstration to work.
...
Kara reminds us that while NDAs are important protection that should be entered into before disclosing confidential information with respect to a potential business relationship, an NDA by itself may not be sufficient protection against misappropriation by the prospective business partner.

Similar Profiles

Other People with this Name

Other people with the name Kara

Michael Kara
Re/max Allegiance

Dan Kara
RoboUniverse

Zahra Kara
Ja'ffari Islamic Centre

Vasilisa Kara
Age Defying Dermatology

Yekta Kara
IKSV STUDIO

Browse ZoomInfo's Business Contact Directory by City

Browse ZoomInfo's
Business People Directory

Browse ZoomInfo's
Advanced Company Directory