proceedings relating to California State Bar Court Judge Patrice
Pictured above is Judge McElroy
, who is either unwilling or unable to
recognize the seriousness of her
in the "Bribing Pat" saga alerted TLR
, McElroy's integrity is amiss. (Photo: Courtesy
of Bar Journal.)
According to the sources, Judge McElroy's
misconduct as it relates to
City firm, which accuses Judge McElroy
Additionally, and pursuant to an order from the Ninth Circuit Court of
Appeals, "David" (who also sued Judge McElroy
in a civil action) plans
to call Judge McElroy
to the stand during a special hearing before a
federal magistrate to determine whether his
due process rights were
Finally, in connection with the saga known as "Bribing Pat",
misconduct will be addressed with the California Supreme
Counsel and Judge Patrice McElroy.
In another instance, during a hearing presided over by Judge McElroy
However, Judge McElroy
failed to disclose that at or about the time the
hearing in question was taking place, she
accepted as a gift from Mr.
Feeling victimized, Mr. Khanna advanced an action against McElroy
was accused of being biased and hostile.
Presiding over the case is Judge Patrice McElroy.
had intentionally engaged in destruction and spoliation of
evidence for the purpose of harming his
, who has been accused of spoliation of evidence.
misconduct is leveled against McElroy
(as in the Gottschalk case) Is Mr. Miller involvement in various official proceedings the Board of
Governors takes to defend McElroy
(in a civil suit, for example)
No doubt, McElroy
is aware of the animosity between Girardi
Were allegations of grave misconduct committed by McElroy
in prior cases
were intentionally ignored in order to give McElroy
the opportunity to
previously reported that McElroy
declined to allow for "Discovery"
Most notable among these are the bribery of Judge Patrice McElroy, the forced departure of the former PJ Ronald Stovitz, and the forced departure of the Executive Director, Ms. Judy Johnson.
BRIBING PAT - - the Shocking Details Behind the Bribery of State Bar Court Judge Patrice McElroy.
A suit was filed for the purpose of vacating factual findings and legal
conclusions made by Judge Patrice McElroy of the State Bar Court.
suit alleges that McElroy
issued rulings in exchange for a gift she
secretly accepted from private counsel.
The gift which was bestowed on
was a trip overseas.
While Judge McElroy
presided over the case, the State
with McElroy seeking the disqualification of Dean from representing
Student 3's motion was denied by McElroy
A new deposition of student 2 was scheduled, and again she
represented by her
counsel of choice- Dean.
During the deposition, Dean
referred to Student 3 as a "Son of a Bitch", whereupon Student 3 aborted
Student 3 filed a new motion with the State Bar Court.
granted the motion, while at the same time chastised Student 3
wished Student 3 had proceeded with the deposition despite
Dean's unprofessional behavior and resort to profanity.
Dean, unhappy with McElroy's decision, sent McElroy a letter in which he
will not produce his
client for another deposition,
and would rather face contempt charges.
, capitulated and issued
an order which stated that the deposition proceed in writing.
also ordered the parties to show-up for a status conference.
After the status-conference concluded, as Student 3 was about to exit
the courtroom, McElroy
disclosed off-the-record that Dean had previously
direct supervisor at the office of public defender.
asked Judge McElroy
to put this disclosure on the record, which she
Dean, on his
part, never disclosed to Student 3 during any of those
proceedings that he
was acquainted with Judge McElroy
This despite the
, shockingly, refused to allow the discovery process to be
Under normal circumstances, a motion to re-open discovery, we
are told, are granted as a matter of routine.
Later, a hearing before Judge McElroy
took place, in which she
which Dean disclosed that while the case was pending before McElroy
Dean had approached McElroy
and offered her
to join him for a trip
accepted Dean's offer and never disclosed it to any
one, let alone Student 3.
At this point in time, while Student 3 case was with the Review
Department, and on the day he
deposed Dean, the saga of "Bribing Pat"
The work of Patrice McElroy
, a judge with the Hearing Department of the