Criminal Law, Indian Law
has represented individuals accused of criminal offenses ranging from minor speeding tickets to capital murder since 2003.
Although the consequences and strategies differ in each case, his
approach remains the same.
In order for the client-lawyer relationship to be successful, there must actually be a relationship.
It must be a relationship where the client feels comfortable and confident that their lawyer truly cares about their case.
Secondly, there is no substitute for preparation.
There is no consistent way for an attorney to reach the best possible result unless he
takes the time and steps necessary to be fully prepared in each and every case.
Finally, an attorney must be open to negotiate, but willing and able to aggressively litigate for his
uses this approach to reach the best possible result for his
Nathan is a native of Western North Carolina and graduate of Western Carolina University.
He earned his law degree from Regent University in Virginia Beach, Virginia.
While in law school, he
was chosen to intern with the 30th District Attorney's Office as well as one of Virginia Beach's largest and most respected criminal defense firms.
Upon graduation, he moved back home and for nine years worked with Melrose, Seago & Lay, P.A., where he was a partner for five years.
Nathan is active in community, church and legal organizations and has served on various boards including the Criminal Justice Partnership Program and the Salvation Army.
He is a member of the Academy of Trial Lawyers, North Carolina Bar Association, Advocates for Justice, Young Trial Lawyers Association and more.
Nathan has represented several individuals throughout western North Carolina charged with first-degree murder and has attended the "Capital College" in Raleigh, NC.
Each year, Nathan
attends multiple continuing education courses devoted to innovative ways to better represent those accused of crimes.
prides himself on being a "student of the law," keeping current on the most recent Court of Appeals and Supreme Court opinions relating to his
has also worked on post-conviction cases throughout his career and received relief from the Court in State v. Charman, 18 N.C. App.