Share This Profile
Share this profile on Facebook.
Link to this profile on LinkedIn.
Tweet this profile on Twitter.
Email a link to this profile.
See other services through which you can share this profile.
This profile was last updated on 1/20/12  and contains information from public web pages and contributions from the ZoomInfo community.

Assistant Professor

Phone: (202) ***-****  HQ Phone
Email: m***@***.edu
Washington College of Law
4801 Massachusetts Ave, NW, Suite 505
Washington Dc , District of Columbia 20016
United States

Company Description: We have made our curriculum qualitatively different. WCL cares about teaching. Numerous faculty members engage in projects to develop integrated teaching. This...   more

Employment History


  • Harvard law school
37 Total References
Web References
Miami, Florida Product Liability Lawyer :: Manufacturer Responsibility: Are Products Safer and Manufacturers More Responsible? (Part 2) :: Hollywood Product Defect Attorney, 20 Jan 2012 [cached]
19. Testimony of Professor Mark Hager, Assistant Professor of Law, Washington College of Law, American University, at Consumer Subcommittee Hearing on S. 1400, April 5, 1990, transcript at 126.
News - Group Says Lawyer Made Secret Deal, 4 Nov 1998 [cached]
In early 1997, they retained lawyer Mark M. Hager, a professor at American University, to champion their cause.
But according to the D.C. Office of Bar Counsel, the group that prosecutes lawyer misconduct, Hager didn't file suit against Warner-Lambert Co., the maker of Nix lice shampoo. Instead, he met with Warner-Lambert's attorneys and cut a deal for himself and his co-counsel: In exchange for $225,000, Hager agreed to drop the matter and hand over the names of 90 consumers interested in joining the suit, the Bar Counsel alleges.
Those allegations are part of ethics charges filed recently against Hager, who teaches torts and labor law at American's Washington College of Law. A hearing on the matter is scheduled for Nov. 23. Hager referred calls to his attorney, Mark Foster, who declined to comment.
It's common for law professors to moonlight as litigators, so Hager, who is a frequently quoted expert on product-liability matters, must have seemed like an ideal attorney for Debra Duke and a neighbor.
In April 1997, Hager was collecting the names of consumers willing to join the plaintiffs' case, according to the Bar Counsel. By June, roughly 50 people had signed up and 40 more were ready to join the potential class, close to the 100 required by law. But the following month, the Bar Counsel contends, Warner-Lambert heard about the proposed class action and initiated discussions with Hager.
The Bar Counsel has alleged that Hager violated 10 of its Rules of Professional Conduct.
Last June, the D.C. Office of Bar Counsel, which prosecutes ethics cases here, accused Mark Hager, a tenured professor at the Washington College of Law, with 11 violations of the D.C. Rules of Professional Conduct.
The case, which apparently raises novel ethics issues under the D.C. rules, stems from a confidential deal, which included $225,000 in attorney fees, that Hager and his Boston co-counsel reached in 1997 with the Warner-Lambert Co., the pharmaceutical giant that was the target of their clients' complaints.
It is undisputed that Hager achieved for his clients the full relief that they could have won in court. Bar counsel's primary charge, however, is that Hager violated ethics rules by resolving the matter, before a complaint was filed, without informing his clients.
At last week's hearing before a three-person committee of the D.C. Board on Professional Responsibility, it appeared that the outcome of the ethics case was likely to turn on the arcane issue of whether the deal struck between Hager and Warner-Lambert lawyers was a "settlement agreement."
Senior Assistant Bar Counsel Elizabeth Herman, prosecuting Hager, argued at the hearing that Hager violated ethics rules by entering into the agreement, which included refunds, a money-back guarantee on the product, and a pledge by Hager not to sue the company without his clients' consent.
If the committee finds that Hager did violate ethics rules, the sanctions would almost certainly not reach the level of suspension, given Hager's clean record.
The matter has its roots in early 1997, when Erika Littlewood, a Richmond, Va., resident and an acquaintance of Hager's, asked him to look into filing suit over the alleged ineffectiveness of NIX, Warner-Lambert's anti-lice shampoo.
Hager, who has maintained a mostly pro bono, part-time practice since joining AU's faculty in 1988 as a professor of constitutional law and torts, told Littlewood that he would be interested in pursuing a class action against Warner-Lambert. Hager testified that he had never handled a class action before.
Littlewood, Hager, and Boston solo practitioner John Trafficonte, a classmate of Hager's at Harvard Law School, then set about to find the 100 plaintiffs they would need to qualify for class certification. Littlewood, Hager, and Boston solo practitioner John Trafficonte, a classmate of Hager's at Harvard Law School, then set about to find the 100 plaintiffs they would need to qualify for class certification.
"We never imagined that it would be so difficult and take so long," Hager testified at the hearing.
The attorneys also were worried that they lacked the requisite scientific background to succeed in the case.
"For every product failure, there are three or four factual explanations," Hager testified. "Because the other explanations are always out there, we were afraid of not getting [certified] on a factual basis."
What's more, there was the possibility that the suit would be dismissed even if the court did certify the class. Under the Magnuson-Moss Act, which Hager and Trafficonte planned to invoke, Warner-Lambert would have the right to "cure" the dispute by issuing refunds to the plaintiffs, thus ending the case.
At about the same time, Hager testified, Warner-Lambert found out that a suit was brewing, and company counsel Karel Zaruba contacted Trafficonte to see if there was a way to resolve the matter before litigation.
On Aug. 8, Hager and Trafficonte reached the deal with Warner-Lambert that became the focus of the ethics case.
In the resolution, entitled "Settlement Agreement," Warner-Lambert granted unlimited refunds for the lawyers' 90 clients, agreed to create a scientific panel to investigate pesticide-resistant lice, offered a money-back guarantee to future purchasers of NIX, and agreed to pay Hager and Trafficonte $225,000 in fees.
In return, the lawyers agreed not to sue Warner-Lambert and not to divulge the fact or the amount of the attorney fees to anyone, including their clients, Hager testified.
Hager and Trafficonte furnished Warner-Lambert with the names of the 90 would-be plaintiffs, while insisting that they retained the right to sue if the company reneged on the bargain.
"Without the confidentiality, we would not have had a resolution," Hager testified. "We wanted to answer that question. We were obligated not to answer that question. Hager also testified that while negotiating the deal, he informed Littlewood of the agreement's basic terms, and that she was not satisfied with Warner-Lambert's concessions.
Hager refused but offered to pay her for the time she had invested in creating a web-site for the case.
Debra Duke, a friend of Littlewood's and one of the potential plaintiffs, says that when Hager offered so readily to pay Littlewood, she began to think something was wrong.
Duke confronted Hager and Trafficonte with her concerns, but they would not reveal anything about their fees.
"In the beginning," Duke says, "Hager said he thought this could be the suit of the century."
Hager is charged with three violations of the ethics rules that rely on the definition of "settlement": Rule 1.2 (a), failing to abide by his clients' decisions concerning the settlement of a matter; Rule 1.4 (c), failing to inform his clients of an offer of settlement; and Rule 5.6, participating in offering or making an agreement in which a restriction on his right to practice was part of the settlement of a controversy between parties.
Bar counsel also accuses Hager of crafting the deal without his clients' consent or consultation, and of disregarding their right to know about the fees he received. The petition also asserts that his silence on the fee matter amounted to dishonesty.
Center for Justice & Democracy -- Board of Advisors, 2 Nov 1999 [cached]
Mark HagerProfessor of Law , Washington College of Law , American University
LegalBase Outsourcing - Legal Outsourcing (LPO) Firm in Sri Lanka, 22 Feb 2009 [cached]
Mark Hager
Mark Hager graduated from Harvard law school and worked as a corporate and intellectual property associate at a leading U.S. law firm Foley Hoag in Boston. He then served for fifteen years as Professor of Law at American University in Washington D.C. while maintaining a federal litigation practice. His background is especially strong in complex litigation and employment law. Mark is an American and resides in Sri Lanka.
Settlement in lice shampoo case probed, 10 Aug 2009 [cached]
One of the attorneys, Mark M. Hager of Washington, has beencharged with 10 ethics violations by the District of Columbia Office of Bar Counsel in the matters.
Hager, who teaches law at American University is accused of violatingethics rules by reaching a settlement agreement with Warner-Lambert beforea lawsuit was filed and by failing to notify his clients of the agreement.
The agreement, dated Aug. 8, 1997, specified that the pharmaceuticalcompany would pay Hager and Traficente $225,000 to drop the matter andturn over the names of 90 people who had expressed interest in becomingplaintiffs in a class-action suit that would likely allege breach of warranty.
Other People with the name "Hager":
Other ZoomInfo Searches
Accelerate your business with the industry's most comprehensive profiles on business people and companies.
Find business contacts by city, industry and title. Our B2B directory has just-verified and in-depth profiles, plus the market's top tools for searching, targeting and tracking.
Atlanta | Boston | Chicago | Houston | Los Angeles | New York
Browse ZoomInfo's business people directory. Our professional profiles include verified contact information, biography, work history, affiliations and more.
Browse ZoomInfo's company directory. Our company profiles include corporate background information, detailed descriptions, and links to comprehensive employee profiles with verified contact information.