Share This Profile
Share this profile on Facebook.
Link to this profile on LinkedIn.
Tweet this profile on Twitter.
Email a link to this profile.
See other services through which you can share this profile.
This profile was last updated on 11/10/11  and contains information from public web pages.

Appellant, Appellee

Phone: (650) ***-****  HQ Phone
Google Inc
1600 Amphitheatre Parkway
Mountain View , California 94043
United States

Company Description: Google Inc. maintains an index of Websites and other online content, and makes this information freely available through its search engine to anyone with an...   more

Employment History

8 Total References
Web References
Featured Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations - Other Statutes Cases :: Justia News, 10 Nov 2011 [cached]
Google Incorporated, et al v. Leo Stoller
Appellant: LEO D. STOLLER
Featured Appeal - Bankruptcy Cases :: Justia News, 14 July 2011 [cached]
Leo Stoller vs. Google Inc Featured Case Filed: January 8, 2007 as 1:2007cv00092 Updated: August 20, 2010 13:41:34 Appellant: Leo Stoller Appellee: Google Inc Creditor: Pure Fishing, Inc.
Google Incorporated, et al v. ..., 6 April 2011 [cached]
Google Incorporated, et al v. Leo Stoller
Appellant: LEO D. STOLLER
Movant: Leo Stoller Trustee: Richard M. Fogel, not individually, but as chapter 7 trustee of the bankruptcy estate of Leo Stoller
Judge Kendall denied third party ... [cached]
Judge Kendall denied third party Leo Stoller's motion to intervene pursuant to Fed.
24 -- Stoller also filed a motion to interplead and various motions to suspend the proceedings for various reasons.Plaintiff Google brought the instant suit alleging civil RICO violations based upon defendants' alleged scheme of falsely claiming trademark rights to extort money from legitimate trademark holders.Defendants' opposed Google's application for its "Google" mark based upon allegedly fraudulent claims of common law rights in the mark in order to settle the dispute.Stoller subsequently filed a Chapter 13 bankruptcy case, which was converted to Chapter 7.The property of Stoller's estate included wholly-owned interests in defendants.The Court denied Stoller's motion to intervene as of right because Stoller had no "direct, significant legally protectable" interest in the case.To the extent Stoller was involved in the underlying actions, it was as an employee of one or more of the defendants and/or acting as defendants' representative, not in his individual capacity.Similarly, the Court denied Stoller permissive intervention because of the Court's determination that adding Stoller would unduly delay the case.The Court noted that the parties had entered a settlement contemplating Google's release of its monetary claims, contingent upon an entry of a permanent injunction and final judgment, a settlement the be "frustrate[d]" by Stoller's intervention.
Tags: FRCP 24, Federal Rules, Google, Intervention, Kendall, Leo Stoller, RICO, Rentamark,, Stealth Industries, central Manufacturing
Send To A Friend Print This Article
The Trademark Blog: Stoller Archives, 10 April 2006 [cached]
Leo Stoller Opposes Google's Application For GOOGLE
Other People with the name "Stoller":
Other ZoomInfo Searches
Accelerate your business with the industry's most comprehensive profiles on business people and companies.
Find business contacts by city, industry and title. Our B2B directory has just-verified and in-depth profiles, plus the market's top tools for searching, targeting and tracking.
Atlanta | Boston | Chicago | Houston | Los Angeles | New York
Browse ZoomInfo's business people directory. Our professional profiles include verified contact information, biography, work history, affiliations and more.
Browse ZoomInfo's company directory. Our company profiles include corporate background information, detailed descriptions, and links to comprehensive employee profiles with verified contact information.