No Photo Available

Last Update

2014-06-08T00:00:00.000Z

This profile was last updated on .

Is this you? Claim your profile.

Wrong Leighton Stuart?

Dr. Leighton Stuart

American Ambassador

Nanking

Get ZoomInfo Grow

+ Get 10 Free Contacts a Month

Please agree to the terms and conditions

I agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. I understand that I will receive a subscription to ZoomInfo Grow at no charge in exchange for downloading and installing the ZoomInfo Contact Contributor utility which, among other features, involves sharing my business contacts as well as headers and signature blocks from emails that I receive.

Nanking

Background Information

Employment History

Ambassador

Freda Utley

United States Ambassador

Web References (13 Total References)


Books About Pens

www.booksaboutpens.com [cached]

Then Leighton Stuart, the American ambassador in Nanking, cabled Reynolds that Dr. Sah Pen-tung, director general of the Academia Sinica, objected and demanded that he come to Nanking to make the necessary arrangements before the expedition could proceed.


FREEDOMS FOUNDATION AT VALLEY FO

www.fredautley.com [cached]

And on page 209, we read that the Communists had rejected "every overture General Marshall and Dr. Stuart had persuaded the Government to make.

...
The United States Ambassador, Dr. Leighton Stuart, wrote frequently of the critical situation of the Nationalist forces and their desperate need of ammunition.
...
And on August 10, 1948, panic-stricken by the imminent success of the Marshall-Acheson policy designed to establish a coalition government in China, Ambassador Stuart wrote: "Even though at present some form of coalition seems most likely, we believe that from the standpoint of the United States it would be most undesirable.
...
The fact that the delays and difficulties, and price hoists, which defeated the intent of the China Aid Act were deliberate is indicated by a letter written to Secretary of State Marshall by Ambassador Stuart from Nanking dated May 10, 1948.
...
Stuart's letter continues:
...
Dr. Leighton Stuart, who loved the Chinese and wished them well, seems to have been unable, nevertheless, to make up his mind between the dictates of practical common sense and his "liberal" affiliations. His reports show his vacillation between his convinced belief that the National Government must reform in order to be saved, and his lively appreciation of the fact that there was little time or opportunity for it to institute a democratic form of government in view of the imminent danger of all China's being overwhelmed by the Communist totalitarian tyranny. He continued to fill his dispatches with long laments concerning the shortcomings of the National Government, while also issuing warnings of the disastrous effects to be expected from the Communist conquest of China.
...
As late as November 28, 1947, Secretary of State Marshall wrote to our Ambassador in China, Leighton Stuart (as quoted in the White Paper):
...
On October 29, 1947, Ambassador Stuart had written:


The United States Ambassador, Dr. ...

fredautley.com [cached]

The United States Ambassador, Dr. Leighton Stuart, wrote frequently of the critical situation of the Nationalist forces and their desperate need of ammunition.

...
And on August 10, 1948, panic-stricken by the imminent success of the Marshall-Acheson policy designed to establish a coalition government in China, Ambassador Stuart wrote: "Even through at present some form of coalition seems most likely, we believe that from the standpoint of the United States it would be most undesirable.
...
The fact that the delays and difficulties, and price hoists, which defeated the intent of the China Aid Act were deliberate is indicated by a letter written to Secretary of State Marshall by Ambassador Stuart from Nanking dated May 10, 1948.
...
Stuart's letter continues:
...
Dr. Leighton Stuart, who loved the Chinese and wished them well, seems to have been unable, nevertheless, tomake up his mind between the dictates of practical common sense and his "liberal" affiliations. His reports show his vacillation between his convinced belief that the National Government must reform in order to be saved, and his lively appreciation of the fact that there was little time or opportunity for it to institute a democratic form of government in view of the imminent danger of all China's being overwhelmed by the Communist totalitarian tyranny.
...
The United States Ambassador, Dr. Leighton Stuart, wrote frequently of the critical situation of the Nationalist forces and their desperate need of ammunition.
...
And on August 10, 1948, panic-stricken by the imminent success of the Marshall-Acheson policy designed to establish a coalition government in China, Ambassador Stuart wrote: "Even through at present some form of coalition seems most likely, we believe that from the standpoint of the United States it would be most undesirable.
...
The fact that the delays and difficulties, and price hoists, which defeated the intent of the China Aid Act were deliberate is indicated by a letter written to Secretary of State Marshall by Ambassador Stuart from Nanking dated May 10, 1948.
...
Stuart's letter continues:
...
Dr. Leighton Stuart, who loved the Chinese and wished them well, seems to have been unable, nevertheless, tomake up his mind between the dictates of practical common sense and his "liberal" affiliations. His reports show his vacillation between his convinced belief that the National Government must reform in order to be saved, and his lively appreciation of the fact that there was little time or opportunity for it to institute a democratic form of government in view of the imminent danger of all China's being overwhelmed by the Communist totalitarian tyranny.


Too Little,Too Late

www.fredautley.com [cached]

The United States Ambassador, Dr. Leighton Stuart, wrote frequently of the critical situation of the Nationalist forces and their desperate need of ammunition.

...
And on August 10, 1948, panic-stricken by the imminent success of the Marshall-Acheson policy designed to establish a coalition government in China, Ambassador Stuart wrote: "Even through at present some form of coalition seems most likely, we believe that from the standpoint of the United States it would be most undesirable.
...
The fact that the delays and difficulties, and price hoists, which defeated the intent of the China Aid Act were deliberate is indicated by a letter written to Secretary of State Marshall by Ambassador Stuart from Nanking dated May 10, 1948.
...
Stuart's letter continues:
...
Dr. Leighton Stuart, who loved the Chinese and wished them well, seems to have been unable, nevertheless, tomake up his mind between the dictates of practical common sense and his "liberal" affiliations. His reports show his vacillation between his convinced belief that the National Government must reform in order to be saved, and his lively appreciation of the fact that there was little time or opportunity for it to institute a democratic form of government in view of the imminent danger of all China's being overwhelmed by the Communist totalitarian tyranny.


Then Leighton Stuart, the ...

www.booksaboutpens.com [cached]

Then Leighton Stuart, the American ambassador in Nanking, cabled Reynolds that Dr. Sah Pen-tung, director general of the Academia Sinica, objected and demanded that he come to Nanking to make the necessary arrangements before the expedition could proceed.

Similar Profiles

Other People with this Name

Other people with the name Stuart

Martin Stuart
Pfizer Inc

Alvin Stuart
ITBrainiac Inc

Julie Stuart
The Fred Hollows Foundation

Kevin Stuart
John S Hayes & Associates Pty Ltd

Robert Stuart
Southwestern Eye Center

City Directory Icon

Browse ZoomInfo's Business Contact Directory by City

People Directory Icon

Browse ZoomInfo's
Business People Directory

Company Directory Icon

Browse ZoomInfo's
Advanced Company Directory