Share This Profile
Share this profile on Facebook.
Link to this profile on LinkedIn.
Tweet this profile on Twitter.
Email a link to this profile.
See other services through which you can share this profile.
This profile was last updated on 12/30/11  and contains information from public web pages.

Ms. Kelly Vieira-simmons

Wrong Kelly Vieira-simmons?

Superior Court Judge

MARIN COUNTY
 
Background

Employment History

  • Member of Prosecutorial Team
    Kamena
  • Deputy District Attorney
6 Total References
Web References
AND CURRENT MARIN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ...
www.newsmakingnews.com, 1 Dec 2009 [cached]
AND CURRENT MARIN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE KELLY VIEIRA-SIMMONS
AND CURRENT MARIN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ...
www.newsmakingnews.com, 10 Mar 2009 [cached]
AND CURRENT MARIN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE KELLY VIEIRA-SIMMONS
...
A recent article by this reporter described the grand jury corruption and the cover-up of child abuse that was orchestrated by former Marin County District Attorney Paula Kamena and her then-deputy district attorney Kelly Vieira-Simmons ( Click.). Under Kamena's authority, Vieira-Simmons conducted a "special" criminal grand jury impaneled by then-presiding judge Michael Buck Dufficy.
...
Vieira-Simmons spent most of her presentation to the grand jury trying to suppress, explain away or mislead the grand jurors concerning the abuse of Carol Mardeusz' daughter.
...
Ms. Vieira-Simmons: I am not permitted to answer that question.
Juror No.13: Are you going to present any medical evidence? Has H been examined to see if the charges--
Ms. Vieira-Simmons: What I can tell you is that when I say that the police officers have fully investigated the case, it involved and could involve having taken her to see persons and despite that no evidence was found to substantiate it. I cannot tell you anything more than that.
Vieira-Simmons reached the point of exasperation at grand jurors' questions and began to deceive the grand jurors about the existence and nature of any medical testimony:
...
Vieira-Simmons and DA Kamena ordered the evidence of the examination destroyed ( Click.).
...
Kamena and Vieira-Simmons then called for a special grand jury to indict Carol Mardeusz who had attempted to get a court order to take her child away from the abuser.
...
However, the court of appeals lambasted Marin District Attorney Paula Kamena and her deputy district attorney Kelly Vieira-Simmons for asking witnesses improper questions.
...
Convicting Mardeusz was imperative to the political future of DA Paula Kamena, Family Law Judge Michael Dufficy and, of course, prosecutor Kelly Vieira-Simmons.
...
They found that Vieira-Simmons engaged in "clearly improper" questioning of some of the witnesses.
...
Vieira-Simmons' first target was Registered Nurse Barbara Parrett.
...
After all, Vieira-Simmons was cloaked with the authority of the "People of the State of California" and a top member of Kamena's prosecutorial team and she urged them to think so.
...
Did Vieira-Simmons take a poll of all these judges and district attorneys to obtain some foundation for her questioning?
...
Perhaps the jury would have merely laughed at the Marin County District Attorney's office if Vieira-Simmons' had asked Ms. Parrett, "Would you opinion change if the President of the United States and the Congress shared an opinion that Mardeusz was not an honest person?
...
However, Vieira-Simmons' question, akin to that, was rather more cunning and calculating.
...
If the jury had not heard Vieira-Simmons "clearly improper" questions would Carol Mardeusz have been convicted?
...
Vieira-Simmons repeated her line of improper questioning to two more witnesses, empowering these questions and responses with even greater weight in the eyes and ears of the jury.
...
The First District Court of Appeals noted that Vieira-Simmons also asked Mardeusz' character witness, her sister Mary Ann Modick improper questions: "Ms.
...
Vieira-Simmons plowed on to the next witness. She asked Mardeusz's brother, Lawrence Van Zandt if he was "aware of a report written by a probation officer in Sonoma County by the name of Susan Rivett indicating that she believes that, in fact, your sister is a dishonest person? Van Zandt replied, "I have no idea."
The First District Court of Appeals held that Vieira-Simmons' line of questioning of Modick and Van Zandt was improper in form. The court said, "Here, the prosecutor offered no foundation to indicate that these witnesses would have any reason to know of Mardeusz' reputation in the courts, the district attorney's office or the probation department."
Finally, the justices opined that it was not reasonably probable that the erroneous and improper questioning by the Marin County District Attorney's office affected the judgment. The court stated, "Although the questions allowed on cross examination were improper we cannot say that there is a reasonable probability that they affected the outcome of the trial."
Even though this Appellate Court did not overturn the jury's verdict because of the deputy district attorney's improper questioning, a question will always remain - what would the jury really have decided if this slew of improper questions were not asked by Vieira-Simmons and allowed in by Judge Adams?
...
Ironically, the First District Court of Appeal's opinion has also marked the lives of Kamena and Vieira-Simmons for life. The opinion, at best, depicts Vieira-Simmons (promoted to Marin Superior Court Judge in 2005) as an amateur who didn't know how to cross-examine fairly and follow the law.
...
However, the case remains a reminder of who Paula Kamena, Kelly Vieira-Simmons and Judge Verna Adams really are - it is a look into their dark souls.
FORMER MARIN COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY ...
www.newsmakingnews.com [cached]
FORMER MARIN COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY PAULA KAMENA AND CURRENT MARIN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE KELLY VIEIRA-SIMMONS
http
www.newsmakingnews.com, 19 Dec 2005 [cached]
AND CURRENT MARIN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE KELLY VIEIRA-SIMMONS
...
A recent article by this reporter described the grand jury corruption and the cover-up of child abuse that was orchestrated by former Marin County District Attorney Paula Kamena and her then-deputy district attorney Kelly Vieira-Simmons (Click.). Under Kamena's authority, Vieira-Simmons conducted a "special" criminal grand jury impaneled by then-presiding judge Michael Buck Dufficy.
...
Vieira-Simmons spent most of her presentation to the grand jury trying to suppress, explain away or mislead the grand jurors concerning the abuse of Carol Mardeusz' daughter.
...
Ms. Vieira-Simmons: I am not permitted to answer that question.
Juror No.13: Are you going to present any medical evidence?Has H been examined to see if the charges--
Ms. Vieira-Simmons: What I can tell you is that when I say that the police officers have fully investigated the case, it involved and could involve having taken her to see persons and despite that no evidence was found to substantiate it.I cannot tell you anything more than that.
Vieira-Simmons reached the point of exasperation at grand jurors' questions and began to deceive the grand jurors about the existence and nature of any medical testimony:
...
Vieira-Simmons and DA Kamena ordered the evidence of the examination destroyed (Click.).
...
Kamena and Vieira-Simmons then called for a special grand jury to indict Carol Mardeusz who had attempted to get a court order to take her child away from the abuser.
...
However, the court of appeals lambasted Marin District Attorney Paula Kamena and her deputy district attorney Kelly Vieira-Simmons for asking witnesses improper questions.
...
Convicting Mardeusz was imperative to the political future of DA Paula Kamena, Family Law Judge Michael Dufficy and, of course, prosecutor Kelly Vieira-Simmons.
...
They found that Vieira-Simmons engaged in "clearly improper" questioning of some of the witnesses.
...
Vieira-Simmons' first target was Registered Nurse Barbara Parrett.
...
After all, Vieira-Simmons was cloaked with the authority of the "People of the State of California" and a top member of Kamena's prosecutorial team and she urged them to think so.
...
Did Vieira-Simmons take a poll of all these judges and district attorneys to obtain some foundation for her questioning?
...
Perhaps the jury would have merely laughed at the Marin County District Attorney's office if Vieira-Simmons' had asked Ms. Parrett, "Would you opinion change if the President of the United States and the Congress shared an opinion that Mardeusz was not an honest person?"
...
If the jury had not heard Vieira-Simmons "clearly improper" questions would Carol Mardeusz have been convicted?
...
Vieira-Simmons repeated her line of improper questioning to two more witnesses, empowering these questions and responses with even greater weight in the eyes and ears of the jury.
...
The First District Court of Appeals noted that Vieira-Simmons also asked Mardeusz' character witness, her sister Mary Ann Modick improper questions: "Ms.
...
Vieira-Simmons plowed on to the next witness.She asked Mardeusz's brother, Lawrence Van Zandt if he was "aware of a report written by a probation officer in Sonoma County by the name of Susan Rivett indicating that she believes that, in fact, your sister is a dishonest person?"Van Zandt replied, "I have no idea."
The First District Court of Appeals held that Vieira-Simmons' line of questioning of Modick and Van Zandt was improper in form.The court said, "Here, the prosecutor offered no foundation to indicate that these witnesses would have any reason to know of Mardeusz' reputation in the courts, the district attorney's office or the probation department."
Finally, the justices opined that it was not reasonably probable that the erroneous and improper questioning by the Marin County District Attorney's office affected the judgment.The court stated, "Although the questions allowed on cross examination were improper we cannot say that there is a reasonable probability that they affected the outcome of the trial."
Even though this Appellate Court did not overturn the jury's verdict because of the deputy district attorney's improper questioning, a question will always remain - what would the jury really have decided if this slew of improper questions were not asked by Vieira-Simmons and allowed in by Judge Adams?
...
Ironically, the First District Court of Appeal's opinion has also marked the lives of Kamena and Vieira-Simmons for life.The opinion, at best, depicts Vieira-Simmons (promoted to Marin Superior Court Judge in 2005) as an amateur who didn't know how to cross-examine fairly and follow the law.
...
However, the case remains a reminder of who Paula Kamena, Kelly Vieira-Simmons and Judge Verna Adams really are - it is a look into their dark souls.
Why did the Marin County District ...
www.newsmakingnews.com, 7 Aug 2007 [cached]
Why did the Marin County District Attorney Paula Kamena and her deputy Kelly Vieira-Simmons, (now Judge Kelly V. Simmons, appointed in 2005 to the Marin Superior Court) conspire with Judge Dufficy to create and control this "special" criminal grand jury to criminalize a protective mother.
...
Deputy District Attorney Kelly Vieira-Simmons, who was presenting the case to the grand jury, did not object.
...
Dufficy, Kamena, Larson and Vieira-Simmons had created a new type of tribunal-one in which a federal judge magistrate would be foreman of a state grand jury.
...
What follows is an example of how Larson worked hand in glove with deputy district attorney Kelly Vieira-Simmons to spoon feed a finding of indictment to the grand jury:
...
Dufficy and Larson parroted each other's mistakes, as Vieira-Simmons stood silently by.
...
As a result of the grand jurors vote, the indicted protective mother, Carol Mardeusz, who had always had legal custody of her daughter, had to stand trial for numerous felonies and, after a jury trial conducted by Judge Verna Adams and prosecuted by deputy attorney Kelly Vieira-Simmons, Mardeusz was convicted.
Other ZoomInfo Searches
Accelerate your business with the industry's most comprehensive profiles on business people and companies.
Find business contacts by city, industry and title. Our B2B directory has just-verified and in-depth profiles, plus the market's top tools for searching, targeting and tracking.
Atlanta | Boston | Chicago | Houston | Los Angeles | New York
Browse ZoomInfo's business people directory. Our professional profiles include verified contact information, biography, work history, affiliations and more.
Browse ZoomInfo's company directory. Our company profiles include corporate background information, detailed descriptions, and links to comprehensive employee profiles with verified contact information.
zirhbt201304