Last Update

This profile was last updated on 6/11/2009 and contains contributions from the  Zoominfo Community.

is this you? Claim your profile.

Wrong Jeffrey Merkey?

Jeffrey Vernon Merkey

Chief Scientist

Solera Networks Inc

HQ Phone:  (858) 946-1900

Direct Phone: (801) ***-****direct phone

Email: j***@***.com


+ Get 10 Free Contacts a Month

Please agree to the terms and conditions.

I agree to the  Terms of Service and  Privacy Policy. I understand that I will receive a subscription to ZoomInfo Grow at no charge in exchange for downloading and installing the ZoomInfo Contact Contributor utility which, among other features, involves sharing my business contacts as well as headers and signature blocks from emails that I receive.


  • 1.Download
    ZoomInfo Grow
    v sign
  • 2.Run Installation
  • 3.Check your inbox to
    Sign in to ZoomInfo Grow

I agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. I understand that I will receive a subscription to ZoomInfo Community Edition at no charge in exchange for downloading and installing the ZoomInfo Contact Contributor utility which, among other features, involves sharing my business contacts as well as headers and signature blocks from emails that I receive.

Solera Networks Inc


South Jordan, Utah,84095

United States

Company Description

Solera Networks is a pioneer in delivering Network Security Analytics - high-speed network surveillance and forensics platforms for complete capture, classification, indexing, visualization, and reconstruction of any network event. Our systems record and class...more

Background Information

Employment History

The SCO Group Inc

Chief Scientist

Novell Inc




Web References(66 Total References)


Jeffery V. Merkey, Solera Networks' chief scientist, is the inventor of both.

www.soleranetworks.com [cached]

Jeffery V. Merkey, Solera Networks' Chief Scientist, is the inventor of both.

www.deepcapture.com [cached]

Before you answer, consider the insights we can glean from the examples of Rachel Marsden and Jeff Merkey.
Jeff Merkey Merkey is a computer scientist and entrepreneur whose Wikipedia article came under attack by several editors critical of his professional associations. According to Merkey, in 2006, Wales told him that in exchange for a substantial donation, Wales could use his influence to make Merkey's article more agreeable, and to place Merkey himself under Wales's "special protection" as an editor. Merkey made a $5,000 donation and hinted at the possibility of something much larger in the future.

wikipediareview.com [cached]

Regardless, in this case, TechNewsWorld was right to maintain the original version - Merkey did make the accusation (of Wales/WP having accepted a donation to keep his BLP article "clean"), and they didn't try to assert that he was telling the truth, only that he made the accusation.
In March of 2008, former Novell (Nasdaq: NOVL) chief scientist Jeffrey Merkey accused Wales of extortion in a statement to the Associated Press. Wales, Merkey said, asked him for money for Wales' Wikimedia Foundation. After Merkey withdrew his financial support, he was reportedly banned from the Wikipedia site. The first part, regarding Merkey is probably unnecessary as Merkey's claims didn't really hold under scrutiny.

scofacts.org [cached]

Jeff Merkey, Litigious Lunatic
Jeff Merkey launched the vexatious but humorously deranged www.merkeylaw.com website on June 15, 2005, announcing that: PJ's offspring are also named in the complaint and her co-conspirators, as well as other sites who have perpetrated lies that Jeff Merkey works for SCO, etc. ad naseum. That, in turn, led to Merkey accusing me of aiding Communist Czechoslovakian enemies of the United States. This litigation probably won't reveal much about SCO. Why is it here? Well ..., on June 22, because people were curious, I made the complaint and its exhibits available at a couple of scofacts URLs (for which I did not bother to add links from any other scofacts page), and I posted the URLs to the discussions of the case that were occurring on Yahoo.com and LWN.net. On June 23, I removed Exhibit 2, as a courtesy to Novell, Inc., Darren Major, and Larry Angus (see the email ). On July 12, Merkey announced on www.merkeylaw.com that I had "violated a Federal Court Order", that "This conduct amounts and borders on espionage, treason, and domestic terrorism", and that I would be added as a defendant in his suit. Merkey then added me as a defendant on July 20, and I filed a memorandum in the case on August 9. Because there's no "Scofactsfacts" to cover the case, I added this page on August 10, for the benefit of anyone who is interested in the case, or who is in danger of falling for Merkey's ability to appear sane for limited periods of time. 2005-10-20 UPDATE: Merkey dropped his case on September 27. Although 98 days had passed since he had filed the case, no one had yet responded to his complaint, because he had never bothered to serve process upon any of the defendants. He had started to make a Rule 4(d)(2) request that would have obligated me to waive service of process, but he was apparently unwilling or unable to make the seventy-four cents cash outlay that would have been required to complete his request (see the Other Communications section). As mentioned above, on June 23 I removed from this site an old settlement agreement, which Merkey had filed a couple of days earlier as an exhibit to his complaint. On October 20, after determining that the removal had been pointless (see my correspondence with Novell), I restored the item. Below you can now find a complete set of the records in this case. In 1998, the Fourth Judicial District Court of Utah found that Merkey "regularly exaggerates or lies in his comments to others about events happening around him. It is as though he is creating his own separate reality" (see 1998-01-30 ruling, p. 20 , from the TRG case). From the nonsense Merkey has written this year in his court papers, in his email , and on his merkeylaw.com website, it is apparent that in the last seven years there has been no improvement in the gulf between his words and reality. Reading Merkey's ridiculous claims in this case, one might think that there was no danger of anyone ever mistaking Merkey for a rational human being, and certainly no danger of anyone thinking that statements by Merkey could ever be relied upon for any purpose other than entertainment. Unfortunately, however, people have really made such misjudgments, and have done so as recently as June 28, 2005. At a hearing on that date in U.S. v. Mooney et al., prosecutor Veda Travis actually saw fit to call Merkey as a witness for the United States. In the future, I hope that the information on this page will help people avoid making similar serious misjudgments about Merkey. 2006-09-25 UPDATE: A few weeks after he dismissed his own complaint, Merkey moved to reopen the case "for the purpose of enforcing the Courts [sic] orders sealing the Novell/TRG settlement agreement" ( Dkt No. 32). Merkey had filed the old Novell Settlement Agreement as an exhibit to his original complaint. Although having a copy of the Novell Settlement Agreement is useful for checking Merkey's mischaracterizations of it, there are other documents that are much more useful if you're simply looking for confirmation that Merkey is indeed a total nutjob. For one, there's his delusional complaint in this case, in which he describes a broad and murderous conspiracy against him involving "Linux Members", Al-Qaeda beheadings, and weapons of mass destruction. 124. In fact, however, Merkey is not just prone to exaggeration, he also is and can be deceptive, not only to his adversaries, but also to his own partners, his business associates and to the court. He deliberately describes his own, separate reality. ... 131. While it is human nature for each of us to put our own spin on events which we observe -- indeed the heart of most auto accident cases is the different perceptions of eye-witnesses -- Merkey nonetheless regularly exaggerates or lies in his comments to others about events happening around him. It is as though he is creating his own separate reality. (Novell v. Timpanogos Research Group , 46 USPQ.2d 1197, 1204 (Utah 1998)) At various times, Merkey has attempted to intimidate people into not publishing that ruling, by falsely claiming that it was sealed by the court. In truth (as Merkey well knows, during his lucid moments), Judge Schofield's ruling was never sealed, and it is therefore publicly available from the court in Utah County (see these images of a paper copy that the court provided in August 2005). As I discussed in the previous update above, Merkey - despite his frequent insane outbursts - is actually capable of temporarily appearing normal, and this can lead to real harm when people unfamiliar with him fail to realize that they shouldn't believe a word he says. I continue to hope that by leaving the information on this page available here, where it might be found by someone who is considering trusting Merkey in any way (including, God forbid, by any other prosecutors who might be considering using Merkey as a witness for the state), that I might help someone to avoid making a serious mistake. Merkey v. Perens et al JEFFREY VERNON MERKEY, #30 Merkey, Show cause: #33 Support memo; #35 Support affidavit "MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION AND AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF UTAH MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMICUS BRIEF" [pdf] (filed by Merkey) Motion Hearing held on 8/17/2005 re #8 MOTION to Expedite Discovery filed by Jeff V Merkey,. (Court Reporter Laura Robinson.)" Transcript: "Motion for Expedited Discovery" [html] [unofficial pdf]. 2005-08-18 (unnumbered) Add and Terminate Judges Docket text: "**RESTRICTED DOCUMENT** SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jeff V Merkey as to Al Petrofsky served on 12/8/2005, answer due 12/28/2005". Merkey's lawsuit-related pronouncements appeared at www.merkeylaw.com. The domain whois record shows that it was registered to Merkey's "Utah Native American Church" ( Utah corp. 4982981-0145) on 2005-06-14. Here are local archived copies of two pages that appeared there: 2005-06-15: The initial homepage , announcing that he seeks billions of dollars in damages. 2005-08-25 Certified Mail from Merkey. Entire contents of envelope: 2005-09-09 Voicemail "... Novell's coming after you ..." [transcript] [audio mp3], from Merkey. 2005-09-16 Letter re: "Vexation in Novell's name by Jeffrey Vernon Merkey" [html] [pdf] from Petrofsky. The ruling includes several findings about Merkey's estrangement from reality. (It also contains interesting analysis of trade secrets law, and it is the first ruling by any state or federal court in the tenth circuit to adopt the doctrine of "inevitable disclosure", which is why the ruling was published, as 46 USPQ.2d 1197.) Merkey's initial response, made on the same day, was an amusing letter about Schofield's "Mormon masters" [pdf] . Merkey later filed an Affidavit of Prejudice, which was the subject of Judge Hansen's 1999-01-07 ruling [pdf] , which finds that Merkey's affidavit "fails to support any allegation of bias or prejudice with legal sufficiency". The prosecution called Merkey to testify against Mooney at his initial detention hearing on 2005-06-28 (see the minutes and the transcript). Merkey testified that Mooney's attorney was threatening him with continuing litigation in retaliation for merely "provid[ing] any information" to the authorities prosecuting Mooney (transcript at 40:8-24).

Similar Profiles


Browse ZoomInfo's Business
Contact Directory by City


Browse ZoomInfo's
Business People Directory


Browse ZoomInfo's
Advanced Company Directory